Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mortality from Solid Cancers among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries

Hauptmann, M., Lubin, J. H., Stewart, P. A., Hayes, R. B., Blair, A.·2004·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

In industrial workers, formaldehyde exposure has been associated with cancer of the nasal cavities, nasopharynx, prostate, lung, and pancreas; however, these associations are inconsistent and remain controversial. Animals exposed to formaldehyde show excesses of nasal cancer. In an extended follow-up of a large cohort of formaldehyde-exposed workers, the authors evaluated mortality from solid cancers (1,921 deaths) among 25,619 workers (865,708 person-years) employed in 10 US formaldehyde-producing or -using facilities through 1994. Exposure assessment included quantitative estimates of formaldehyde exposure. Standardized mortality ratios and relative risks were calculated. Compared with that for the US population, mortality from solid cancers was significantly lower than expected among subjects exposed and nonexposed to formaldehyde (standardized mortality ratios = 0.91 and 0.78, respectively). Relative risks for nasopharyngeal cancer (nine deaths) increased with average exposure intensity, cumulative exposure, highest peak exposure, and duration of exposure to formaldehyde (p-trend = 0.066, 0.025, <0.001, and 0.147, respectively). Formaldehyde exposure did not appear to be associated with lung (744 deaths), pancreas (93 deaths), or brain (62 deaths) cancer. Although relative risks for prostate cancer (145 deaths) were elevated for some measures of formaldehyde exposure, the trend was inconsistent. In this cohort of formaldehyde-industry workers, some evidence was found of an exposure-response relation with mortality from nasopharyngeal cancer (based on small numbers) but not for cancers of the pancreas, brain, lung, or prostate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwh174

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 1986, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 76, 195
  2. Kerns, 1983, Cancer Research, 43, 4382
  3. Blair, 1986, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 76, 1071
  4. Gardner, 1993, British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 50, 827
  5. Partanen, 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 19, 8, 10.5271/sjweh.1500 · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1500
  6. Roush, 1987, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 79, 1221
  7. Hildesheim, 2001, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 10, 1145
  8. Walrath, 1984, Cancer Research, 44, 4638
  9. Bertazzi, 1986, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 12, 461, 10.5271/sjweh.2111 · doi:10.5271/sjweh.2111
  10. Collins, 2001, American journal of industrial medicine, 39, 336, 10.1002/1097-0274(200103)39:3<336::AID-AJIM1022>3.0.CO;2-K · doi:10.1002/1097-0274(200103)39:3<336::aid-ajim1022>3.0.co;2-k
  11. Stroup, 1986, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 77, 1217
  12. LUCAS, 1994, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 86, 1556, 10.1093/jnci/86.20.1556 · doi:10.1093/jnci/86.20.1556
  13. BLAIR, 1990, American Journal of Epidemiology, 131, 510, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115525 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115525
  14. 1987, APPL INDUST HYG, 2, 231, 10.1080/08828032.1987.10388468 · doi:10.1080/08828032.1987.10388468
  15. 1994, American journal of industrial medicine, 25, 603, 10.1002/ajim.4700250414 · doi:10.1002/ajim.4700250414
  16. Sterling, 1988, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association, 30, 895, 10.1097/00043764-198811000-00019 · doi:10.1097/00043764-198811000-00019
  17. Sterling, 1994, American journal of industrial medicine, 25, 593, 10.1002/ajim.4700250413 · doi:10.1002/ajim.4700250413
  18. Sterling, 1995, American journal of industrial medicine, 27, 301, 10.1002/ajim.4700270214 · doi:10.1002/ajim.4700270214
  19. Marsh, 1992, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association, 34, 42
  20. Youk, 2001, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 43, 767, 10.1097/00043764-200109000-00006 · doi:10.1097/00043764-200109000-00006
  21. Dallas, 1985, Journal of toxicology and environmental health, 16, 553, 10.1080/15287398509530763 · doi:10.1080/15287398509530763
  22. Casanova-Schmitz, 1984, Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 76, 26, 10.1016/0041-008X(84)90026-7 · doi:10.1016/0041-008x(84)90026-7
  23. Dell, 1995, American journal of industrial medicine, 28, 373, 10.1002/ajim.4700280307 · doi:10.1002/ajim.4700280307
  24. 1986, International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, 15, 487
  25. Stayner, 1985, American journal of industrial medicine, 7, 229, 10.1002/ajim.4700070305 · doi:10.1002/ajim.4700070305
  26. Wilson, 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine / American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 287, 10.1097/01.jom.0000116802.01928.83 · doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000116802.01928.83

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Hauptmann, M., Lubin, J. H., Stewart, P. A., Hayes, R. B., & Blair, A.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2004-06-10
Volume
159
Issue
12
Pages
1117-1130
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2142382772
Cited by
331
References
42
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality from Solid Cancers among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aje/kwh174
The paper
Hauptmann, M., Lubin, J. H., Stewart, P. A., Hayes, R. B., & Blair, A. (2004). Mortality from Solid Cancers among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries. American Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh174

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.