Cited by 42Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninWorkplace Health and Well-being

Effects on health of a change from a delaying to an advancing shift system

Open access
Barton, J, Folkard, S, Smith, L, Poole, C J·1994·Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--Shift work can lead to a range of problems for some people that seem to result from the disturbance of the circadian system, and can broadly be classified as: disturbances of sleep, impaired physical and psychological health, and disturbed social and domestic life. The main attempt to try to reduce these problems has focused on the design of the shift system, and the identification of the most problematic features of the shift system. One such feature is believed to be the direction of shift rotation. Systems that advance are thought to be more problematic than those that delay. The present study examines the change in the direction of shift rotation from a delaying to an advancing system on health and wellbeing. METHODS--Self reported measures of tolerance to shift work were taken two months before and six months after the change. These included sleep difficulties, gastrointestinal problems, psychological ill health, chronic fatigue, social and domestic disruption, job satisfaction, and satisfaction with the shift system. RESULTS--The change from a delaying to an advancing system resulted in an increase in sleep difficulties between successive afternoon shifts, but a decrease in social disruption. There was little evidence of impaired health on the advancing compared with the delaying system. CONCLUSIONS--The increase in sleep difficulties was thought to result from the undesired adaptation of the circadian system to night work, as a result of the afternoon shifts now following a series of night shifts, whereas previously they followed a series of morning shifts. The decrease in social disruption was thought to result from the specific sequence of the shifts and the discontinuous nature of the shift system, in particular, the long week-end off every third week. Lack of reported health related differences are explained in terms of the relatively unharmful nature of the shift system in question, and the relatively short time span over which the study was conducted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oem.51.11.749

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Barton 1994, selective reporting was at low risk of bias because there was no evidence of selective reporting and results were probably reported as planned.

    “Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting. Results were probably reported as planned.”

    From Adapting shift work schedules for sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness in shift workers (2023) · cites this paper as Barton 1994

    The Statistical Analyses section says that only significant differences are reported, contrary to the claim that there was no evidence of selective reporting. The paper does not establish that results were reported as planned. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Barton 1994, the intervention was at low risk of being confounded by other changes over time because no other changes were mentioned.

    “Intervention independent of other changes over time Low risk No other changes mentioned in the paper.”

    From Adapting shift work schedules for sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness in shift workers (2023) · cites this paper as Barton 1994

    The Discussion reports a change over time besides the shift intervention: the first assessment was in winter and the second in summer. The authors say this seasonal difference probably contributed to reduced sleep duration across all three groups, contrary to the claim that no other changes were mentioned. The paper does not, however, identify another concurrent workplace intervention. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Barton 1994, blinding of outcome assessment for subjective measures was at high risk of bias because blinding was not feasible and all outcomes were subjectively measured and self-reported.

    “Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective measures High risk Blinding of participants was not feasible, considering the nature of the intervention. All outcomes were subjectively measured and self‐reported.”

    From Adapting shift work schedules for sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness in shift workers (2023) · cites this paper as Barton 1994

    The Measures and Procedure sections describe self-administered, self-reported questionnaires completed by workers, supporting the account of subjective outcomes. The paper does not itself assess detection bias or state that blinding was infeasible; the high-risk rating is the citing authors’ assessment rather than a finding reported by Barton et al. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Barton 1994, blinding of participants and personnel for subjective measures was at high risk of bias because blinding was not feasible given the nature of the intervention.

    “Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Subjective measures High risk Considering the nature of the intervention itself, blinding of participants was not feasible.”

    From Adapting shift work schedules for sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness in shift workers (2023) · cites this paper as Barton 1994

    The DESIGN AND CONTEXT and MEASURES sections describe a change in workers’ shift schedules assessed with self-reported questionnaires, supporting the subjective-measures context. The paper says workers did not know at baseline which system would change, but it does not state that later blinding was infeasible or assess performance bias as high risk; that rating is the citing authors’ assessment. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The review did not include Knauth 1998 or Barton 1994 in any meta-analyses due to insufficient available data.

    “We did not include Knauth 1998 or Barton 1994 in any meta‐analyses due to insufficient available data: Knauth 1998 presented no data on relevant outcomes, while Barton 1994 did not report any measures of variability, such as SDs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]1. Costa G, Apostoli P, D'Andrea F, Gaffuri E. Gastro- intestinal and neurotic disorders in textile shift workers. In: Reinberg A, Vieux N, Andlauer P, eds. Night and shift work: biological and social aspects. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
  2. [2]2. Rutenfranx J, Haider M, Koller M. Occupational health measures for night workers and shiftworkers. In: FolkardS, Monk TH, eds. Hours of work: temporalfactors in work scheduling. Chichester: Wiley, 1985.
  3. [6]6. Walker J. Social problems of shiftwork. In: S Folkard, TH Monk, eds. Hours of work: temporalfactors in work schedul- ing. Chichester: Wiley, 1985.
  4. [9]9. Lavie P, Chillag N, Epstein R, Tzischinsky 0, Givon R, FuchsS, Shahal B. Sleep disturbance in shiftworkers: a marker for maladaptation syndrome. Work and Stress 1989;3:33-40.
  5. [17]17. Epstein R, Tzischinsky 0, Lavie P. Sleep-wake cycle in rotating shift workers: effects of changing fromphase advance to phase delay rotation. Paper presented at the 20th international conference on chronobiology. Tel Aviv, Israel: 1991.
  6. [26]26. Folkard S, Barton J, Costa G, Smith L, Spelten E, Totterdell P. The standard shiftwork index. Ergonomics 1993;36:313.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barton, J., Folkard, S., Smith, L., & Poole, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1994-11
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
749-755
ISSN
  • 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
OpenAlex
W2131294673
Cited by
42
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
shift work, circadian rhythm disruption, sleep disorders, gastrointestinal problems, mental illness, chronic fatigue, social disruption, job satisfaction, health and well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Circadian Rhythm, Fatigue, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep Wake Disorders, Time Factors, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review