Cited by 41Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Lipid lowering with inclisiran: a real-world single-centre experience

Open access
Padam, Pritpal, Barton, Lucy, Wilson, Stewart, David, Alessia, Walji, Shahenaz, de Lorenzo, Ferruccio, Ray, Kausik K, Jones, Ben +1 more·2022·Open Heart

Abstract

Objective: The reduction in circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is the primary aim of lipid-lowering therapies as a method of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Inclisiran is a new and potent lipid-lowering drug that is shown to be effective in reducing LDL-c in randomised controlled trials, however, real-world data of its use are not yet known. We sought to analyse the early effects of this drug in a tertiary centre lipid and cardiovascular risk clinic. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the first 80 patients who received a single dose of inclisiran at our lipid clinic between 1 December 2021 and 1 September 2022. Data were collected using electronic healthcare records. Baseline blood tests were taken prior to start of treatment and were repeated at 2 months follow-up. Data on adverse events were also recorded. Results: At 2 months after treatment initiation, mean baseline LDL-c fell from 3.5±1.1 mmol/L by 48.6% to 1.8±1.0 mmol/L and total cholesterol from 5.7±1.3 mmol/L by 33.3% to 3.8±1.1 mmol/L (both p<0.0001). Mean high-density lipoprotein-c rose by 7.7% to 1.4±0.4 mmol/L (p=0.02) and median triglycerides fell by 31.3% to 1.1 mmol/L (IQR 0.9–2) (p=0.001). Adverse events (injection site reaction, fatigue and headache) were recorded in three patients and all had self-resolved by time of follow-up. Conclusion: Inclisiran use in line with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines led to significant lowering of LDL-c at 2 months, with efficacy similar to that reported in trials with good tolerability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002184

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-world data remain limited and inconclusive regarding whether inclisiran yields better adherence than monoclonal antibodies.

    “While inclisiran’s twice-yearly dosing regimen is hypothesized to enhance medication adherence,14 real-world data remain limited and inconclusive regarding whether inclisiran yields better adherence than moAbs.15,16”

    From Adherence to PCSK9 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Discussion describes this as the first real-world report on inclisiran’s LDL-c reduction, with only two months of follow-up, supporting the point that real-world evidence was limited. It notes that no patient discontinued after the first dose and says this could improve adherence, but it does not compare adherence with monoclonal antibodies or assess whether inclisiran yields better adherence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 3232– 45. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw334 27523477 PMC13480964 · DOI
  2. [2]Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the interheart study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937– 52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9 15364185 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]NICE. Inclisiran for treating primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia, 2022. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta733 [Accessed 09 Sept 2022]. 40802800
  4. [7]Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, et al. A new equation for calculation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with normolipidemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5: 540– 8. 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0013 32101259 PMC7240357 · DOI
  5. [8]Banach M, Stulc T, Dent R, et al. Statin non-adherence and residual cardiovascular risk: there is need for substantial improvement. Int J Cardiol 2016; 225: 184– 96. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.075 27728862 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [9]Maddox TM, Chan PS, Spertus JA, et al. Variations in coronary artery disease secondary prevention prescriptions among outpatient cardiology practices: insights from the NCDR (national cardiovascular data registry). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 539– 46. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.053 24184238 PMC3990248 · DOI
  7. [10]Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk: the task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of cardiology (ESC) and European atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 2019; 41: 111– 88. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 31504418 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [11]Jeong HJ, Lee H-S, Kim K-S, et al. Sterol-dependent regulation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 expression by sterol-regulatory element binding protein-2. J Lipid Res 2008; 49: 399– 409. 10.1194/jlr.M700443-JLR200 17921436 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padam, P., Barton, L., Wilson, S., David, A., Walji, S., de Lorenzo, F., Ray, K. K., Jones, B., & Cegla, J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Lipids and Cardiovascular Risk Service, Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Corresponding author
Cegla, Jaimini
Venue
Open Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-12
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
e002184
ISSN
2053-3624 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311309800
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Open Heart (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2017-21-002, ACF-2010-21-012)
  • Academy of Medical Sciences (SGL019\1078)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023667/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
inclisiran, LDL cholesterol lowering, lipid-lowering therapy, PCSK9 inhibition, real-world effectiveness, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, hypercholesterolemia, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, adverse events, injection site reactions, NICE guidelines
MeSH terms
Hypolipidemic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Retrospective Studies, RNA, Small Interfering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review