Cited by 197Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthMedication Adherence and ComplianceAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Statin non-adherence and residual cardiovascular risk: There is need for substantial improvement

Banach, Maciej, Stulc, Tomas, Dent, Ricardo, Toth, Peter P.·2016·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Although statin therapy has proven to be the cornerstone for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD), there are many patients for whom long-term therapy remains suboptimal. The aims of this article are to review the current complex issues associated with statin use and to explore when novel treatment approaches should be considered. Statin discontinuation as well as adherence to statin therapy remain two of the greatest challenges for lipidologists. Evidence suggests that between 40 and 75% of patients discontinue their statin therapy within one year after initiation. Furthermore, whilst the reasons for persistence with statin therapy are complex, evidence shows that low-adherence to statins negatively impacts clinical outcomes and residual CV risk remains a major concern. Non-adherence or lack of persistence with long-term statin therapy in real-life may be the main cause of inadequate low density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with statins. There is a large need for the improvement of the use of statins, which have good safety profiles and are inexpensive. On the other hand, in a non-cost-constrained environment, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors should arguably be used more often in those patients in whom treatment with statins remains unsatisfactory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.075

Cites

168 of 168 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banach, M., Stulc, T., Dent, R., & Toth, P. P.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • Amgen (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Banach, Maciej
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
225
Pages
184-196
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2527622017
Cited by
197
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Amgen (Europe) GmbH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
residual cardiovascular risk, statin discontinuation, LDL cholesterol lowering, PCSK9 inhibitors, hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular disease prevention, lipid-lowering therapy
MeSH terms
Proprotein Convertase 9, PCSK9 Inhibitors, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Cholesterol, HDL, Risk Factors, Sleep Wake Disorders, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Medication Adherence, Myalgia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review