Cited by 244Electronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities

Open access

Abstract

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly integrated into healthcare settings to improve patient outcomes, reduce medical errors and enhance clinical efficiency by providing clinicians with evidence-based recommendations at the point of care. However, the adoption and optimisation of these systems remain a challenge. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of CDSS, discussing their development, implementation, benefits, limitations and future directions. We also explore the potential for enhancing their effectiveness and provide an outlook for future developments in this field. There are several challenges in CDSS implementation, including data privacy concerns, system integration and clinician acceptance. While CDSS have demonstrated significant potential, their adoption and optimisation remain a challenge.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432

Cites

121 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The history of CDSS. AI, artificial intelligence; CDSS, clinical decision support system.
Figure 1 The history of CDSS. AI, artificial intelligence; CDSS, clinical decision support system.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 PRECISE-CARING for the benefits of CDSS. CDSS, clinical decision support system.
Figure 2 PRECISE-CARING for the benefits of CDSS. CDSS, clinical decision support system.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 CAUCICETCI: multifaceted strategies for CDSS advancement. AI, artificial intelligence; CDSS, clinical decision support system; EHRs, electronic health records.
Figure 3 CAUCICETCI: multifaceted strategies for CDSS advancement. AI, artificial intelligence; CDSS, clinical decision support system; EHRs, electronic health records.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 121 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kim KM , Yefimova M , Lin FV , et al . A home-recovery surgical care model using AI-driven measures of activities of daily living. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv 2022;3. doi:10.1056/CAT.22.0081 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Z., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Yanping
  • Shi, Nannan
Venue
Open Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-11
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
e002432
ISSN
2053-3624 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389101129
Cited by
244
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 35
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Open Heart (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Independent Selection Project (Z0830)
  • Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine Independent Selection Project, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (Z0830-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, evidence-based recommendations, medical errors, clinical efficiency, data privacy, system integration, clinician acceptance, point-of-care decision support, patient outcomes
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review