Cited by 2,246Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationElectronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine

Open access
He, Jianxing, Baxter, Sally L., Xu, Jie, Xu, Jiming, Zhou, Xingtao, Zhang, Kang·2019·Nature Medicine

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in medicine is advancing rapidly, but real-world clinical implementation has not yet become a reality. Here we review some of the key practical issues surrounding the implementation of AI into existing clinical workflows, including data sharing and privacy, transparency of algorithms, data standardization, and interoperability across multiple platforms, and concern for patient safety. We summarize the current regulatory environment in the United States and highlight comparisons with other regions in the world, notably Europe and China.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increasing availability of digital health data, advances in computational capacity, and progress in algorithm development have accelerated AI integration into clinical practice.

    “The increasing availability of digital health data, advances in computational capacity, and progress in algorithm development have accelerated its integration into clinical practice [3].”

    From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision-Making: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications, Validation Gaps, Bias, and Deployment Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The current status of AI in medicine section describes easier access to health data, but says that substantial implementation of AI in clinical use had not yet occurred. The Abstract likewise distinguishes rapidly advancing AI technologies from their limited implementation in patient-care settings, contrary to the claim that these developments had accelerated integration into clinical practice. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An AI tool's effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes depends on its adoption by front-line clinicians.

    “An AI tools' effectiveness in improving clinical outcomes depends on its adoption by front-line clinicians, where “the rubber meets the road.”12”

    From Clinician Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Detect Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Primary Care. (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The 'Education of an AI-literate workforce' section says stakeholders must be involved in implementation and healthcare providers need AI knowledge to work effectively on human–machine teams. 'Future directions' describes improved outcomes as a promise of these technologies. The paper does not specifically establish that improved clinical outcomes depend on adoption by front-line clinicians. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In general, AI tools have shown promise in development, but few have been able to translate into real-world settings for patient management.

    “In general, AI tools have shown promise in development, but few have been able to translate into the real-world settings for patient management [4].”
  • Productizing AI algorithms for clinical use is an exceptionally complex task.

    “Beyond developing AI algorithms, productizing them for clinical use is an exceptionally complex task4,13.”
  • AI adoption in healthcare is expected to grow, but its actual implementation currently remains limited due to a variety of challenges.

    “While AI adoption is expected to grow, its actual implementation currently remains limited due to a variety of challenges.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep Learning (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016).
  2. How long it takes the US FDA to approve 510(k) submissions. Emergo https://www.emergobyul.com/resources/research/fda-510k-review-times-research (2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • He, Jianxing
  • Zhang, Kang
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2019-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
30-36
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2906295032
Cited by
2,246
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 308 · 2025: 420 · 2024: 395 · 2023: 356 · 2022: 282 · 2021: 251 · 2020: 164 · 2019: 69 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Guangzhou Medical University
  • Guangzhou University
  • Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM011271)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, clinical implementation, clinical workflow, data sharing, data privacy, algorithmic transparency, data standardization, interoperability, patient safety, AI regulation, health policy
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medicine, Reference Standards, Social Control, Formal, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review