The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the evaluation of perioperative risk in non-cardiopulmonary surgery
Abstract
The use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) as a preoperative risk stratification tool for a range of non-cardiopulmonary surgery is increasing. The utility of CPET in this role is dependent on the technology being able to identify accurately and reliably those patients at increased risk of perioperative events when compared with existing risk stratification tools. This article identifies and reviews systematically the current literature regarding the use of CPET as a preoperative tool for stratifying risk in major non-cardiopulmonary surgery. Specifically, it focuses on evaluating the capacity of CPET variables to predict the risk of postoperative complications and mortality in comparison to other methods of risk assessment. Furthermore, the potential for combining results from CPET and non-CPET methods of risk prediction to enhance the capacity to identify high risk patients is considered. The review indicates that CPET can identify patients at increased risk of adverse perioperative outcomes. However, the selection of variables and threshold values to indicate high risk differ for different surgical procedures and underlying conditions. Furthermore, the available data suggest that CPET variables outperform alternative methods of preoperative risk stratification. Several studies also identify that CPET variables may be used in combination with non-CPET variables to increase perioperative risk prediction accuracy. These findings illustrate that CPET has the capacity to identify patients at increased risk of adverse outcome before a range of non-cardiopulmonary surgical procedures. Further research is required to optimise its use, potentially by combining CPET results with alternative methods of risk stratification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test
(2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 · Cited by 11,195
Cited by
Low, D. E., Allum, W., De Manzoni, G., Ferri, L., Immanuel, A., Kuppusamy, M., Law, S., Lindblad, M., Maynard, N., Neal, J., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4 · Cited by 641
Levett, D. Z. H., Jack, S., Swart, M., Carlisle, J., Wilson, J., Snowden, C., Riley, M., Danjoux, G., Ward, S. A., Older, P., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.020 · Cited by 466
Self-citationRandomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection
Dunne, D. F. J., Jack, S., Jones, R. P., Jones, L., Lythgoe, D. T., Malik, H. Z., Poston, G. J., Palmer, D. H., & Fenwick, S. W. (2016) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10096 · Cited by 331
Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
Protopapa, K. L., Simpson, J. C., Smith, N. C. E., & Moonesinghe, S. R. (2014) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9638 · Cited by 305
Guazzi, M., Arena, R., Halle, M., Piepoli, M. F., Myers, J., & Lavie, C. J. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw180 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Hennis, P. J., Meale, P. M., & Grocott, M. P. W.
- Venue
- Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-21
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1030
- Pages
- 550-557
- ISSN
- 0032-5473 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2111700063
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the evaluation of perioperative risk in non-cardiopulmonary surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/pgmj.2010.107185
- The paper
- Hennis, P. J., Meale, P. M., & Grocott, M. P. W. (2011). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the evaluation of perioperative risk in non-cardiopulmonary surgery. Postgraduate Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2010.107185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.