The DOI matches its Crossref record; 181 of the 181 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations
Abstract
Introduction: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure. Methods: A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: Thirty‐nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure. Conclusions: The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
Van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., & Bouillon, R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011300 · Cited by 9,977
Intravenous Fluids and Acute Kidney Injury
Ding, X., Cheng, Z., & Qian, Q. (2017) · Blood Purification · doi:10.1159/000452702 · Cited by 6,827
Perioperative Chemotherapy versus Surgery Alone for Resectable Gastroesophageal Cancer
Cunningham, D., Allum, W. H., Stenning, S. P., Thompson, J. N., Van de Velde, C. J. H., Nicolson, M., Scarffe, J. H., Lofts, F. J., Falk, S. J., Iveson, T. J., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa055531 · Cited by 6,334
Self-citationEnhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review
Ljungqvist, O., Scott, M., & Fearon, K. C. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952 · Cited by 3,564
Self-citationDriving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Amato, M. B. P., Meade, M. O., Slutsky, A. S., Brochard, L., Costa, E. L. V., Schoenfeld, D. A., Stewart, T. E., Briel, M., Talmor, D., Mercat, A., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1410639 · Cited by 2,801
Kurz, A., Sessler, D. I., & Lenhardt, R. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605093341901 · Cited by 2,760
Shapiro, J., van Lanschot, J. J. B., Hulshof, M. C. C. M., van Hagen, P., van Berge Henegouwen, M. I., Wijnhoven, B. P. L., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., Nieuwenhuijzen, G. A. P., Hospers, G. A. P., Bonenkamp, J. J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00040-6 · Cited by 2,565
Nygren, J., Thacker, J., Carli, F., Fearon, K. C. H., Norderval, S., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., Soop, M., & Ramirez, J. (2013) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6 · Cited by 2,171
Self-citation
Cited by
Brindle, M., Nelson, G., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., & Gustafsson, U. O. (2020) · BJS Open · doi:10.1002/bjs5.50238 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Low, D. E., Allum, W., De Manzoni, G., Ferri, L., Immanuel, A., Kuppusamy, M., Law, S., Lindblad, M., Maynard, N., Neal, J., Pramesh, C. S., Scott, M., Mark Smithers, B., Addor, V., & Ljungqvist, O.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 299-330
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W2894674184
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 181
- FWCI
- 45.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4
- The paper
- Low, D. E., Allum, W., De Manzoni, G., Ferri, L., Immanuel, A., Kuppusamy, M., Law, S., Lindblad, M., Maynard, N., Neal, J., Pramesh, C. S., Scott, M., Mark Smithers, B., Addor, V., & Ljungqvist, O. (2019). Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
