Neuropsychological testing
Open accessAbstract
Neuropsychological testing is a key diagnostic tool for assessing people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment, but can also help in other neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury and epilepsy. While cognitive screening tests offer gross information, detailed neuropsychological evaluation can provide data on different cognitive domains (visuospatial function, memory, attention, executive function, language and praxis) as well as neuropsychiatric and behavioural features. We should regard neuropsychological testing as an extension of the neurological examination applied to higher order cortical function, since each cognitive domain has an anatomical substrate. Ideally, neurologists should discuss the indications and results of neuropsychological assessment with a clinical neuropsychologist. This paper summarises the rationale, indications, main features, most common tests and pitfalls in neuropsychological evaluation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657 · see citing works
Separate visual pathways for perception and action
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · Cited by 6,519 · see citing works
Litvan, I., Goldman, J. G., Tröster, A. I., Schmand, B. A., Weintraub, D., Petersen, R. C., Mollenhauer, B., Adler, C. H., Marder, K., Williams‐Gray, C. H., et al. (2012) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.24893 · Cited by 2,609 · see citing works
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Memory Since H.M.
Squire, L. R., & Wixted, J. T. (2011) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113720 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke
Siegel, J. S., Ramsey, L. E., Snyder, A. Z., Metcalf, N. V., Chacko, R. V., Weinberger, K., Baldassarre, A., Hacker, C. D., Shulman, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521083113 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Cordell, C. B., Soo Borson, B., Boustani, M. A., Chodosh, J., Reuben, D. B., Verghese, J., Thies, W. H., Fried, L. B., & Workgroup, M. D. O. C. I. (2012) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2012.09.011 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment
Cullen, B., O'Neill, B., Evans, J. J., Coen, R., & Lawlor, B. A. (2006) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.095414 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Clinical and imaging assessment of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
Rocca, M. A., Amato, M. P., De Stefano, N., Enzinger, C., Geurts, J. J., Penner, I.-K., Rovira, A., Sumowski, J. F., Valsasina, P., & Filippi, M. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70250-9 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Natural course of mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson disease
Pedersen, K. F., Larsen, J. P., Tysnes, O., & Alves, G. W. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003634 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Post‐stroke cognitive decline: an update and perspectives for clinical research
Brainin, M., Tuomilehto, J., Heiss, W., Bornstein, N. M., Bath, P. M., Teuschl, Y., Richard, E., Guekht, A. B., Quinn, T. J., & the Post Stroke Cognition Study Group (2014) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/ene.12626 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Rabinovici, G. D., Stephens, M. L., & Possin, K. L. (2015) · CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.con.0000466658.05156.54 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Functional Anatomic Models of Language: Assembling the Pieces
Shalom, D. B., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858407305726 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
The Mini-Mental State Examination: pitfalls and limitations
Devenney, E. M., & Hodges, J. R. (2016) · Practical Neurology · doi:10.1136/practneurol-2016-001520 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Vuilleumier, P. O. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12161 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Metacognitive function poststroke: a review of definition and assessment
Banna, M. A., Redha, N. A., Abdulla, F., Nair, B., & Donnellan, C. (2015) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2015-310305 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Neuropsychological assessment in epilepsy
Baxendale, S. (2018) · Practical Neurology · doi:10.1136/practneurol-2017-001827 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Neuropsychological Evaluation in Traumatic Brain Injury
Soble, J. R., Critchfield, E. A., & O’Rourke, J. J. F. (2017) · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2016.12.009 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Foundas, A. L. (2013) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52901-5.00028-9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The clinical assessment of apraxia
Cassidy, A. (2016) · Practical Neurology · doi:10.1136/practneurol-2015-001354 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Andrewes, D. G. (2015) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.4324/9781315652481-4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Schulz, P. E., & Arora, G. (2015) · CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.con.0000466664.35650.b4 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Miller, N. (2017) · Practical Neurology · doi:10.1136/practneurol-2016-001526 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Zucchella, C., Federico, A., Martini, A., Tinazzi, M., Bartolo, M., & Tamburin, S.
- Affiliations
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
- University of Verona (IT)
- Keele University (GB)
- Neurology Unit, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
- Department of Rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation Unit, Habilita, Zingonia, Italy
- Corresponding author
- Tamburin, Stefano
- Venue
- Practical Neurology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-02-22
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-237
- ISSN
- 1474-7758 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-7766
- OpenAlex
- W4254711427
- Semantic Scholar
- 3c8c7676d41d015a78716c39c43096889784cd29
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.keele.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Practical Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- neuropsychological assessment, cognitive screening tests, dementia, mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, cognitive domain, neuropsychiatric symptoms, behavioral characteristics, clinical neuropsychology
- MeSH terms
- Cognition Disorders, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Nervous System Diseases, Neuropsychological Tests, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review