Cited by 126Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVoice and Speech Disorders

Speech and language therapy approaches to managing primary progressive aphasia

Open access
Volkmer, Anna, Rogalski, Emily, Henry, Maya, Taylor-Rubin, Cathleen, Ruggero, Leanne, Khayum, Rebecca, Kindell, Jackie, Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa +2 more·2020·Practical Neurology

Abstract

The term primary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a group of neurodegenerative disorders with predominant speech and language dysfunction as their main feature. There are three main variants – the semantic variant, the nonfluent or agrammatic variant and the logopenic variant – each with specific linguistic deficits and different neuroanatomical involvement. There are currently no curative treatments or symptomatic pharmacological therapies. However, speech and language therapists have developed several impairment-based interventions and compensatory strategies for use in the clinic. Unfortunately, multiple barriers still need to be overcome to improve access to care for people with PPA, including increasing awareness among referring clinicians, improving training of speech and language therapists and developing evidence-based guidelines for therapeutic interventions. This review highlights this inequity and the reasons why neurologists should refer people with PPA to speech and language therapists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/practneurol-2018-001921

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Substantial progress has been made to improve language symptoms in frontotemporal dementia.

    “Substantial progress has been made to improve language symptoms.73”

    From Advances and controversies in frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, biomarkers, and therapeutic considerations (2022) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Impairment-based approaches section reports improvements in word retrieval and speech production after therapy for people with primary progressive aphasia, and the Conclusion says the research literature is rapidly developing. The paper does not establish comparable progress for language symptoms across frontotemporal dementia generally; its treatment evidence concerns primary progressive aphasia, some cases of which have Alzheimer’s disease pathology (Introduction). (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volkmer, A., Rogalski, E., Henry, M., Taylor-Rubin, C., Ruggero, L., Khayum, R., Kindell, J., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Warren, J. D., & Rohrer, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Rohrer, Jonathan D
Venue
Practical Neurology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
154-161
ISSN
  • 1474-7758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-7766
OpenAlex
W2965519052
Cited by
126
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Practical Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/M008525/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
primary progressive aphasia, speech therapy, semantic variant PPA, logopenic variant PPA, compensatory strategies, health care access, clinician awareness, evidence-based recommendations, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Humans, Language Therapy, Speech Therapy, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review