Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health care

Open access
Grol, R·2002·Quality and Safety in Health Care

Abstract

What gives value to travel is fear.It is the fact that, at a certain moment, when we are so far from our own country . . .we are seized by a vague fear, and an instinctive desire to go back to the protection of old habits."Albert Camus 1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qhc.11.2.110

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Grol, R.
Venue
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
110-111
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3901
OpenAlex
W2049517753
Cited by
296
References
22
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/qhc.11.2.110
The paper
Grol, R. (2002). Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.2.110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.