Coping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals' psychological well-being
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Previous research has established health professionals as secondary victims of medical error, with the identification of a range of emotional and psychological repercussions that may occur as a result of involvement in error.2 3 Due to the vast range of emotional and psychological outcomes, research to date has been inconsistent in the variables measured and tools used. Therefore, differing conclusions have been drawn as to the nature of the impact of error on professionals and the subsequent repercussions for their team, patients and healthcare institution. A systematic review was conducted. METHODS: Data sources were identified using database searches, with additional reference and hand searching. Eligibility criteria were applied to all studies identified, resulting in a total of 24 included studies. Quality assessment was conducted with the included studies using a tool that was developed as part of this research, but due to the limited number and diverse nature of studies, no exclusions were made on this basis. RESULTS: Review findings suggest that there is consistent evidence for the widespread impact of medical error on health professionals. Psychological repercussions may include negative states such as shame, self-doubt, anxiety and guilt. Despite much attention devoted to the assessment of negative outcomes, the potential for positive outcomes resulting from error also became apparent, with increased assertiveness, confidence and improved colleague relationships reported. CONCLUSION: It is evident that involvement in a medical error can elicit a significant psychological response from the health professional involved. However, a lack of literature around coping and support, coupled with inconsistencies and weaknesses in methodology, may need be addressed in future work.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Wears RL, Wu AW. Dealing with failure: the aftermath of errors and adverse events. Ann Emerg Med 2000;39:344e6.
- Schwappach DLB, Boluarte TA. The emotional impact of medical error involvement on physicians: a call for leadership and organisational accountability. Swiss Med Wkly 2009;139:9e15.
- White AA, Waterman AD, McCotter P, et al. Supporting health care workers after medical error: considerations for health care leaders. J Clin Outcomes Manag 2008;15:240e7.
- Muller D, Ornstein K. Perceptions of and attitudes towards medical errors among medical trainees. Med Educ 2007;41:645e52.
- Harden A, Thomas J. Methodological issue in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8:257e71.
- Peat M, Entwhistle V, Hall J, et al. A scoping review and approach to appraisal of interventions intended to involve patients in patient safety. J Health Serv Res Policy 2010;15:17e25.
- Jackson C, Cheater FM, Reid I. A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions. Health Expect 2008;11:232e51.
- Edwards A, Hood K, Matthews E, et al. The effectiveness of one-to-one risk- communication interventions in health care: a systematic review. Med Decis Making 2000;20:290e7.
- Thomas J, Sutcliffe K, Harden A. Children and healthy eating: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. London: EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 2003.
- Landis JR, Koch GG. Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159e74.
- Hughes EC. Mistakes at work. Canadian J Econ Polit Sci 1951;17:320e7.
- Waterman AD, Garbutt J, Hazel E, et al. The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2007;33:467e76.
- Schelbred AB, Nord R. Nurses' experiences of drug administration errors. J Adv Nurs 2007;60:317e24.
- Fisseni G, Pentzek M, Abholz H. Responding to serious medical error in general practice consequences for the GPs involved: analysis of 75 cases from Germany. Fam Pract 2007;71:9e13.
- Kroll L, Singleton A, Collier J, et al. Learning not to take it seriously: junior doctors' accounts of error. Med Educ 2008;42:982e90.
- Scott SD, Hirschinger LE, Cox KR, et al. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider 'second victim' after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:325e30.
- Mizrahi T. Managing medical mistakes: ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training. Soc Sci Med 1984;19:135e46.
- Engel KG, Rosenthal M, Sutcliffe KM. Residents' responses to medical error: coping, learning, and change. Acad Med 2006;81:86e93.
- Hobgood C, Hevia A, Tamayo-Sarver JH, et al. The influence of the causes and contexts of medical errors on emergency medicine residents' responses to their errors: an exploration. Acad Med 2005;80:758e64.
- West CP, Huschka MM, Novotny PJ, et al. Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathyda prospective longitudinal study. JAMA 2006;296:1071e8.
- Cunningham W. The immediate and long-term impact on New Zealand doctors who receive patient complaints. N Z Med J 2004;117:972.
- Lander LI, Connor JA, Shah RK, et al. Otolaryngologists' responses to errors and adverse events. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1114e20.
- Arndt M. Nurses' medication errors. J Adv Nurs 1994;19:519e26.
- Kaldjian LC, Jones EW, Wu BJ, et al. Reporting medical errors to improve patient safetydSurvey of physicians in teaching hospitals. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:40e6.
- Meurier CE, Vincent CA, Parmar DG. Nurses' responses to severity dependent errors: a study of the causal attributions made by nurses following an error. J Adv Nurs 1998;27:349e54.
- Wolf ZR, Serembus J, Smetzer J, et al. Responses and concerns of healthcare providers to medication errors. Clin Nurse Spec 2000;14:278e90.
- Christensen JF, Levinson W, Dunn PM. The heart of darknessdthe impact of perceived mistakes on physicians. J Gen Intern Med 1992;7:424e31.
- Wu AW, Folkman S, McPhee SJ, et al. Do house officers learn from their mistakes? Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:221e7.
- Crigger NJ, Meek VL. Toward a theory of self-reconciliation following mistakes in nursing practice. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007;39:177e83.
- Martinez W, Lo B. Medical students' experiences with medical errors: an analysis of medical student essays. Med Educ 2008;42:733e41.
- Aasland OG, Forde R. Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors' personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:13e17.
- Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, et al. Patients' physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA 2003;289:1001e7.
- Fischer MA, Mazor KM, Baril J, et al. Learning from mistakesdfactors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:419e23.
- Newman MC. The emotional impact of mistakes on family physicians. Arch Fam Med 1996;5:71e5.
- Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561e71.
- Watson RJD, Richardson PH. Accessing the literature on outcome studies in group psychotherapy: the sensitivity and precision of Medline and PsycINFO bibliographic database searching. Br J Med Psychol 1999;72:127e34.
- Mcdonald S, Taylor L, Adams C. Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. Health Libr Rev 1999;16:151e6.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool
Sirriyeh, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Armitage, G. (2012) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01662.x · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Self-citationBynum, W. E., Artino, A. R., Uijtdehaage, S., Webb, A. M. B., & Varpio, L. (2019) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002479 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients' experiences of adverse events in health care
Harrison, R., Walton, M., Manias, E., Smith–Merry, J., Kelly, P., Iedema, R., & Robinson, L. (2015) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzv075 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
The effects of contributing to patient care on medical students' workplace learning
Smith, S. E., Tallentire, V. R., Cameron, H. S., & Wood, S. M. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12217 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Prudenzi, A., D. Graham, C., Flaxman, P. E., & O’Connor, D. B. (2022) · Psychology, Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/13548506.2021.1898651 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Clinicians risk becoming “liability sinks” for artificial intelligence
Lawton, T., Morgan, P., Porter, Z., Hickey, S., Cunningham, A., Hughes, N., Iacovides, I., Jia, Y., Sharma, V., & Habli, I. (2024) · Future Healthcare Journal · doi:10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100007 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sirriyeh, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Armitage, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Bradford Institute for Health Research (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sirriyeh, R.
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-05-31
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e43-e43
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2149289582
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bradford Scholars (University of Bradford) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
- Keywords
- medical errors, healthcare workers, psychological well-being, shame, guilt, anxiety, self-doubt, assertiveness, colleague relationships, coping
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Health Personnel, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Medical Errors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
