Cited by 80Innovations in Medical EducationEmpathy and Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The effects of contributing to patient care on medical students' workplace learning

Smith, Samantha E, Tallentire, Victoria R, Cameron, Helen S, Wood, S Morwenna·2013·Medical Education

Abstract

Context: Previous research has suggested that as medical students become more senior, they should increasingly take on the roles they will enact as newly qualified doctors by contributing to patient care. However, student contribution to patient care carries inherent risks to patient safety. This study aimed to provide students with a new opportunity to contribute to patient care and to use this as a platform from which to explore the influence of contributing to patient care on medical student learning. Methods: This study took place in the context of final‐year medical student prescribing education at the U niversity of E dinburgh, Edinburgh, UK . Students on attachment at a district general hospital were afforded a unique opportunity to learn prescribing by completing in‐patient drug charts in a process termed ‘pre‐prescribing’. All students were invited to participate in focus groups conducted by the principal researcher. Focus group discussions were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Results: Six focus groups, each lasting 20–50 minutes, were conducted with four to seven participants (33 students in total). The emerging themes took the form of developmental outcomes and learning processes. Developmental outcomes included ability to perform the task, modification of attitudes towards the task, formation of a professional identity, and development of relationships within the team. The central feature of the experience which influenced all developmental outcomes, was making mistakes. The themes interact in complex ways and all contribute towards development as a professional. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that contributing to patient care enhances students' development as professionals. Some of these developmental outcomes, such as improvements in knowledge and skills, may be achievable to some extent within the classroom. Other changes, such as developing relationships, forming a sense of professional identity and modifying attitudes, might arguably be achievable only within the context of contributing to patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/medu.12217

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S. E., Tallentire, V. R., Cameron, H. S., & Wood, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Victoria Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Samantha E
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-11
Volume
47
Issue
12
Pages
1184-1196
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2041047570
Cited by
80
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
medical students, workplace learning, prescribing education, professional identity, professional development, making mistakes, student attitudes, team relationships, patient safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Female, Patient Care, United Kingdom, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Learning, Male, Patient Care Team, Students, Medical, Workplace, Focus Groups, Professional Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review