The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand how lean thinking has been put into practice in healthcare and how it has worked. DESIGN: A realist literature review. Data sources The authors systematically searched for articles in PubMed, Web of Science and Business Source Premier (January 1998 to February 2008) and then added articles through a snowball approach. REVIEW METHODS: The authors included empirical studies of lean thinking applications in healthcare and excluded those articles that did not influence patient care, or reported hybrid approaches. The authors conducted a thematic analysis based on data collected using an original abstraction form. Based on this, they articulated interactions between context, lean interventions, mechanisms and outcomes. RESULTS: The authors reviewed 33 articles and found a wide range of lean applications. The articles describe initial implementation stages and emphasise technical aspects. All articles report positive results. The authors found common contextual aspects which interact with different components of the lean interventions and trigger four different change mechanisms: understand processes to generate shared understanding; organise and design for effectiveness and efficiency; improve error detection to increase awareness and process reliability; and collaborate to systematically solve problems to enhance continual improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Lean thinking has been applied successfully in a wide variety of healthcare settings. While lean theory emphasises a holistic view, most cases report narrower technical applications with limited organisational reach. To better realise the potential benefits, healthcare organisations need to directly involve senior management, work across functional divides, pursue value creation for patients and other customers, and nurture a long-term view of continual improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/1355819054308530 · Cited by 3,190
Lean Thinking—Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967 · Cited by 2,122
How Do You Modernize a Health Service? A Realist Evaluation of Whole‐Scale Transformation in London
GREENHALGH, T., HUMPHREY, C., HUGHES, J., MACFARLANE, F., BUTLER, C., & PAWSON, R. (2009) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00562.x · Cited by 380
Understanding what works—and why—in quality improvement: the need for theory-driven evaluation
Walshe, K. (2007) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm004 · Cited by 237
Vest, J. R., & Gamm, L. D. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-35 · Cited by 216
Improving emergency department efficiency by patient streaming to outcomes-based teams
Kelly, A.-M., Bryant, M., Cox, L., & Jolley, D. (2007) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah070016 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-139 · Cited by 2,585
Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research
Rycroft-Malone, J., McCormack, B., Hutchinson, A. M., DeCorby, K., Bucknall, T. K., Kent, B., Schultz, A., Snelgrove-Clarke, E., Stetler, C. B., Titler, M., et al. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-33 · Cited by 742
Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review
D’Andreamatteo, A., Ianni, L., Lega, F., & Sargiacomo, M. (2015) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.002 · Cited by 623
ZIEBLAND, S., & WYKE, S. (2012) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00662.x · Cited by 554
Systematic review approaches for climate change adaptation research
Berrang-Ford, L., Pearce, T., & Ford, J. D. (2015) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0708-7 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazzocato, P., Savage, C., Brommels, M., Aronsson, H., & Thor, J.
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-08-19
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 376-382
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2130105625
- Cited by
- 627
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 37.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/qshc.2009.037986
- The paper
- Mazzocato, P., Savage, C., Brommels, M., Aronsson, H., & Thor, J. (2010). Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature. BMJ Quality & Safety. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.037986
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.