Cited by 124Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationHealthcare Quality and Management

Improving emergency department efficiency by patient streaming to outcomes-based teams

Open access
Kelly, Anne-Maree, Bryant, Michael, Cox, Lisa, Jolley, Damien·2007·Australian Health Review

Abstract

Objective: To describe the process and results of a process redesign based on task analysis and lean thinking approaches aimed at improving emergency department (ED) efficiency. Methods: Before-and-after study comparing 12- month periods before and after the process redesign for total episodes of ambulance bypass, waiting times (overall and by triage category) and total ED time (overall and by triage category). Time data were analysed using non-parametric methods. Results: The years were broadly comparable, with the exception that there was an 8.4% increase in total hours of care delivered (a marker of ED workload) in the year after the change. Episodes of ambulance bypass reduced by 55% (120 v 54). There were statistically significant waiting times reductions for triage categories 3 and 5 (median reductions 5 and 11 minutes respectively). There was an increase in total ED time for triage category 3 (median increase 7 min) and a decrease for categories 4 and 5 (median reduction 14 and 18 min, respectively). Conclusion: ED process redesign based on task analysis and lean thinking approaches can result in improved ED efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/ah070016

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lean implementation in reviewed emergency departments was associated with decreased waiting time to be seen.

    “Decreased waiting time to be seen [ 72 ] [ 77 ] [ 79 ] [ 80 ] [ 81 ]”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [79]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, A.-M., Bryant, M., Cox, L., & Jolley, D.
Affiliations
Western Hospital (AU)
Venue
Australian Health Review
Published
2007-02-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
16-21
ISSN
  • 0156-5788 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-8944
OpenAlex
W2089364879
Cited by
124
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Health Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
emergency department efficiency, process redesign, task analysis, lean thinking, waiting time, triage categories
MeSH terms
Adult, Emergency Service, Hospital, United Kingdom, Hospital Restructuring, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Length of Stay, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Admission, Patient Care Team, Patient Discharge, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Triage, Victoria, Efficiency, Organizational, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review