Cited by 739Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareSurgical Simulation and TrainingInnovations in Medical Education

Training and simulation for patient safety

Open access
Aggarwal, R., Mytton, O. T., Derbrew, M., Hananel, D., Heydenburg, M., Issenberg, B., MacAulay, C., Mancini, M. E. +4 more·2010·Quality and Safety in Health Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based medical education enables knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired for all healthcare professionals in a safe, educationally orientated and efficient manner. Procedure-based skills, communication, leadership and team working can be learnt, be measured and have the potential to be used as a mode of certification to become an independent practitioner. RESULTS: Simulation-based training initially began with life-like manikins and now encompasses an entire range of systems, from synthetic models through to high fidelity simulation suites. These models can also be used for training in new technologies, for the application of existing technologies to new environments and in prototype testing. The level of simulation must be appropriate to the learners' needs and can range from focused tuition to mass trauma scenarios. The development of simulation centres is a global phenomenon which should be encouraged, although the facilities should be used within appropriate curricula that are methodologically sound and cost-effective. DISCUSSION: A review of current techniques reveals that simulation can successfully promote the competencies of medical expert, communicator and collaborator. Further work is required to develop the exact role of simulation as a training mechanism for scholarly skills, professionalism, management and health advocacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qshc.2009.038562

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patient safety is recognized around the world as a priority, where trial-error-based learning cannot be an option in a real patient.

    “Hence, patient safety is recognized around the world as a priority, where “trial-error”-based learning cannot be an option in a real patient [4].”
  • The virtual patient and simulation in general are merely tools for training purposes, and success in their use does not depend so much on the accuracy of the simulation but rather on how it is used by the instructor and the student.

    “We agree with Aggarwal et al. [4] on the importance of bearing in mind that the VP and the simulation in general are merely tools for training purposes, and that success in their use does not depend so much on the accuracy of the simulation but rather on how it is used by the instructor and the student.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skillsdchanges in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2664e9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aggarwal, R., Mytton, O. T., Derbrew, M., Hananel, D., Heydenburg, M., Issenberg, B., MacAulay, C., Mancini, M. E., Morimoto, T., Soper, N., Ziv, A., & Reznick, R.
Affiliations
  • St Mary's Hospital (GB)
  • Department of Health and Social Care (GB)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • Joint Commission (US)
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Aggarwal, R.
Venue
Quality and Safety in Health Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-08-01
Volume
19
Issue
Suppl 2
Pages
i34-i43
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3901
OpenAlex
W2132115381
Cited by
739
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22390103)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
simulation-based medical education, patient safety, high-fidelity simulation, mannequins, simulation center, procedural training, communication skills, teamwork, leadership, simulation-based assessment, professionalism, health advocacy
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Communication, Computer Simulation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Education, Medical, Graduate, Health Personnel, Humans, Leadership, Manikins, Patient Care Team, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Patient Simulation, Models, Educational, Educational Technology, Medical Errors, Biomedical Technology, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review