Cited by 98Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Condom effectiveness against non-viral sexually transmitted infections: a prospective study using electronic daily diaries.

Open access
Crosby, Richard A, Charnigo, Richard A, Weathers, Chandra, Caliendo, Angela M, Shrier, Lydia A·2012·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the protective value of consistent and correct use of latex condoms against the acquisition of Chlamydia trachomatis,Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis. Methods: Patients (N=929) attending clinics that treat sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were prospectively followed for up to 6 months. Urine STI nucleic acid amplification testing was performed at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Participants were instructed to respond to daily prompts from a handheld device by completing a report for each penile-vaginal sexual intercourse event. Generalised estimating equation models examined associations of consistent as well as consistent and correct condom use with STI incidence over 3-month intervals. Results: Consistent condom use was not significantly associated with STI incidence (Estimated OR (EOR)=0.75; 95% CI (CI) 0.43 to 1.30; p=0.31). However, individuals who used condoms both correctly and consistently were estimated to have 59% lower odds of acquiring an STI (EOR=0.41; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.90; p=.026), compared to those who did not. Conclusions: The correct as well as the consistent use of condoms greatly reduces the odds of non-viral STI acquisition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050618

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies demonstrate that consistent condom use reduces the risk for other STIs, including chlamydia, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, and trichomoniasis.

    “Moreover, studies demonstrate that consistent condom use reduces the risk for other STIs, including chlamydia, gonorrhea, hepatitis B, and trichomoniasis (18–21).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction identifies chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis as the STIs studied. The Results (Multivariate Analyses) find reduced odds only with both correct and consistent condom use; consistent use alone was not significantly protective. This paper does not study hepatitis B. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]United States Department of Health and Human Services Accessed July 5, 2011 Workshop Summary: Scientific evidence on condom effectiveness for sexually transmitted disease (STI) prevention Available on-line at http://www.niaid.nih.gov/dmid/STIs/condomreport.pdf
  2. [10]Zimmerman RS Atwood KA Cupp PK DiClemente RJ Crosby RA Salazar LF Improving validity of self-reports for sensitive behaviors Research methods for health promotion 2006 229 259 Jossey-Bass Wiley San Francisco, CA
  3. [22]Hatcher RA Trussel J Nelson AL Cates W Kowal D Contraceptive technology 2007 Ardent Media New York, NY 19th revised edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crosby, R. A., Charnigo, R. A., Weathers, C., Caliendo, A. M., & Shrier, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Crosby, Richard A
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-09-21
Volume
88
Issue
7
Pages
484-489
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
  • 1472-3263
OpenAlex
W2158547693
Cited by
98
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RA1068119A, 5r01ai068119-05)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington (P30 AI050409)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-050409, R01 AI068119, P30AI050409)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
condom use, latex condoms, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, consistent condom use, electronic diary, penile-vaginal intercourse, STI incidence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Chlamydia trachomatis, DNA, Bacterial, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gonorrhea, Humans, Lymphogranuloma Venereum, Male, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Prospective Studies, Trichomonas Infections, Trichomonas vaginalis, Urine, Incidence, DNA, Protozoan, Condoms, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review