Cited by 28HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

How often do condoms fail? A cross-sectional study exploring incomplete use of condoms, condom failures and other condom problems among black and white MSM in southern USA

Open access
Hernández-Romieu, Alfonso C, Siegler, Aaron J, Sullivan, Patrick S, Crosby, Richard, Rosenberg, Eli S·2014·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the occurrence of risk-inducing condom events (condom failures and incomplete use) and the frequency of their antecedents (condom errors, fit/feel problems and erection problems) between black and white men who have sex with men (MSM), and determine the associations between risk-inducing condom events and their antecedents. METHODS: We studied cross-sectional data of 475 MSM who indicated using a condom as an insertive partner in the previous 6 months enrolled in a cohort study in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. RESULTS: Nearly 40% of black MSM reported breakage or incomplete use, and they were more likely to report breakage, early removal and delayed application of a condom than white MSM. Only 31% and 54% of MSM reported correct condom use and suboptimal fit/feel of a condom, respectively. The use of oil-based lubricants and suboptimal fit/feel were associated with higher odds of reporting breakage (p=0.009). Suboptimal fit/feel was also associated with higher odds of incomplete use of condoms (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete use of condoms and condom failures were especially common among black MSM. Our findings indicate that condoms likely offered them less protection against HIV/sexually transmitted infection when compared with white MSM. More interventions are needed, particularly addressing the use of oil-based lubricants and suboptimal fit/feel of condoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051581

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rates of condom breakage and slippage might be slightly higher during anal intercourse.

    “Rates of breakage and slippage might be slightly higher during anal intercourse (28,29).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results report condom breakage rates during insertive and receptive anal intercourse, and discuss factors associated with slippage. They do not compare either rate with vaginal intercourse, so the claim that rates might be slightly higher during anal intercourse is not established by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Du Bois SN Emerson E Mustanski B Condom-related problems among a racially diverse sample of young men who have sex with men AIDS Behav 2011 15 7 1342 6 Epub 2010/12/15 21153431

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hernández-Romieu, A. C., Siegler, A. J., Sullivan, P. S., Crosby, R., & Rosenberg, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Hernández-Romieu, Alfonso C
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-07-30
Volume
90
Issue
8
Pages
602-607
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
  • 1472-3263
OpenAlex
W2119516595
Cited by
28
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085600)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI050409)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (RC1MD004370)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD067111)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
condom failure, men who have sex with men, Black men, racial disparities, condom breakage, oil-based lubricants, HIV prevention, Southern United States
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Georgia, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Condoms, Risk Assessment, Black People, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review