The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12–13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study
Open accessAbstract
Objective:To examine whether smoking onset in young adolescents is predicted by peer or parental smoking. Design:Longitudinal design with one pretest and one follow-up at 12 months. Setting:Schools in Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain and Portugal. Participants:7102 randomly selected adolescents from six countries. Mean age was 12.78 years. Main outcome measures:Smoking behaviour of adolescents, peers and parents. Results:No support was found for peer smoking as an important predictor of smoking onset in most countries. Support was found for the selection paradigm, implying that adolescents choose friends with similar smoking behaviour. Support for the impact of parents on adolescent behaviour and the choice of friends was also found. Conclusions:Smoking uptake in this age cohort may be more strongly influenced by personal and parental influences than initially believed. Hence, social inoculation programmes teaching youngsters to resist the pressures to smoke may be less appropriate if youngsters have a positive attitude towards smoking, associate smoking with various advantages and look for peers with similar values. For this group attitudes towards smoking may thus guide future friend selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
Cited by
Langford, R., Bonell, C. P., Jones, H. E., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S. M., Waters, E., Komro, K. A., Gibbs, L. F., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008958.pub2 · Cited by 768
Vangeli, E., Stapleton, J., Smit, E. S., Borland, R., & West, R. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03565.x · Cited by 607
Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., Hughes, R., & Moore, L. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60692-3 · Cited by 583
Zhou, X., Nonnemaker, J., Sherrill, B., Gilsenan, A. W., Coste, F., & West, R. (2009) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.013 · Cited by 508
Borland, R., Yong, H. H., O'Connor, R. J., Hyland, A., & Thompson, M. E. (2010) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq038 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- de Vries, H., Candel, M., Engels, R., & Mercken, L.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-03-24
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-89
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W1934115521
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12–13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.2003.007237
- The paper
- de Vries, H., Candel, M., Engels, R., & Mercken, L. (2006). Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12–13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2003.007237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.