Cited by 508Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: Factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study

Zhou, Xiaolei, Nonnemaker, James, Sherrill, Beth, Gilsenan, Alicia W., Coste, Florence, West, Robert·2009·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Objective To identify predictors of attempts to stop smoking and predictors of relapse.Methods This study included 2431 smokers from pre-existing Internet panels in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, France, and Spain. These panel members are Internet users who have registered voluntarily and agreed to participate in various online research studies. Respondents were aged 35-65 years, smoked >or= five cigarettes per day and intended to stop smoking in the next 3 months. They were followed every 3 months for up to 18 months via Internet contact on measures relating to quit attempts, smoking status, motivation to quit, nicotine cue, weight and weight concern, health-related factors, withdrawal symptoms, and smoking cessation aids.Results In this study, recent quit attempts strongly predicted future attempts, but also predicted subsequent relapse. Motivation to quit was predictive of future attempts but not of relapse/abstinence following the attempts. Relapse to smoking was associated with nicotine dependence, exposure to smoking cues, craving, withdrawal symptoms, and lack of smoking cessation aids.Conclusions The findings lend support to a model of cessation in which level of motivation to stop generates quit attempts but plays little role in relapse. Dependence, social smoking cues, and a recently failed quit attempt are important factors in relapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.013

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, X., Nonnemaker, J., Sherrill, B., Gilsenan, A. W., Coste, F., & West, R.
Affiliations
  • RTI Health Solutions (US)
  • Sanofi (France) (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gilsenan, Alicia W.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
365-373
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026364558
Cited by
508
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 24
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, quit attempts, relapse, motivation to quit, nicotine dependence, craving, withdrawal symptoms, smoking cessation aids, weight concern
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Smoking Cessation, Risk Assessment, Internet, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review