Cited by 18Smoking Behavior and CessationHomelessness and Social IssuesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Are homeless transitional shelters receptive to environmental tobacco control interventions?: Table 1

Open access
Arangua, Lisa, McCarthy, William J, Moskowitz, Rebecca, Gelberg, Lillian, Kuo, Tony·2007·Tobacco Control

Abstract

Despite a smoking prevalence approaching 70% among homeless adults in the US,1,2 little is known about ways to intervene on smoking behaviour in this marginalised population. Tobacco control advocates point to marketing by the tobacco industry and the pervasiveness and social acceptance of tobacco use in homeless settings as barriers to promoting effective cessation of smoking and smoke-free environments in this vulnerable population.3 They maintain that homeless service providers continue to hold apparently common assumptions that tobacco is a resource and that their clients have higher priority needs than to quit smoking.3–5 Recent studies, however, have begun to challenge these assumptions.2–6 In a series of focus groups and interviews exploring tobacco use behaviours among the homeless,2 up to 76% of homeless persons interviewed reported an intention to quit smoking in the next 6 months. Recent investigations in tobacco, alcohol and drug addiction have also demonstrated that rehabilitation programmes for misusers are commonly more effective when risky …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tc.2006.018697

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small studies show that homeless people are open to both behavioural and pharmaceutical help with quitting smoking.

    “Findings from small studies111,114,115 of smoking cessation in homeless populations have shown that homeless individuals are receptive to both behavioural and pharmaceutical assistance with smoking cessation.”

    From The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations (2014) · cites this paper as [111]

    The paper’s introductory section (page not specified) reports that up to 76% of homeless people in cited focus groups intended to quit smoking. Its survey findings concern shelters’ receptivity to tobacco-control policies, not residents’ receptivity to behavioural or pharmaceutical cessation assistance; the latter is not reported. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smoking cessation among homeless people is hindered by high environmental exposure in shelters and congregant living facilities, reduced health-care access, and competing health needs.

    “Several factors impede smoking cessation, including high rates of environmental exposure in shelters and other congregant living facilities, reduced access to health care,111 and competing health needs, which decrease health-care providers’”

    From The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations (2014) · cites this paper as [111]

    The paper’s introductory discussion identifies pervasive tobacco use in homeless settings and assumptions about higher-priority needs, but it does not address reduced access to health care—the factor immediately preceding this citation. Searches for health-care access and medical-care availability found no passage supporting that factor. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arangua, L., McCarthy, W. J., Moskowitz, R., Gelberg, L., & Kuo, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (US)
Corresponding author
Kuo, Tony
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-03-30
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
143-144
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2140755835
Cited by
18
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
homeless adults, smoking cessation, smoke-free policies, transitional shelters, tobacco use prevalence, tobacco industry marketing, barriers to quitting, tobacco control interventions
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Housing, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Los Angeles, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review