Cited by 25Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationWorld Trade Organization Law

Trade liberalisation and tobacco control: moving from a policy of exclusion towards a more comprehensive policy

Open access
McGrady, Benn·2007·Tobacco Control

Abstract

Notwithstanding the fact that it has been 10 years since empirical confirmation that trade liberalisation may increase tobacco consumption, tobacco control policy with respect to trade liberalisation and related processes remains largely underdeveloped. The most commonly articulated policy, that tobacco be excluded from the scope of trade agreements, is problematic for a number of reasons and has not been widely implemented. In light of this fact and the potential role of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, further research and policy development are needed in the area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tc.2006.019141

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Australian case illustrates the evolving nature of both the tobacco control norms message and the nature of the messengers to resolve tensions in the tobacco-trade nexus at the domestic level.

    “The Australian case illustrates the evolving nature of both the tobacco control norms message and the nature of the messengers to resolve tensions in the tobacco-trade nexus at the domestic level (Drope & Lencucha, 2013, 2014; McGrady, 2007).”

    From Advancing progressive health policy to reduce NCDs amidst international commercial opposition: Tobacco standardised packaging in Australia (2018) · cites this paper as McGrady, 2007

    The sections “WHAT POLICIES OUGHT TO BE ADVOCATED?” and “NEED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH” advocate a broader tobacco-control approach that recognises trade objectives and coordinates trade and health policy. But the paper does not discuss an Australian case or show how the message and its messengers evolved there; those parts of the attributed claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Hsieh CR, Hu TW, Lin CFJ. The demand for cigarettes in Taiwan: domestic versus imported cigarettes. Contemp Econ Policy 1999;17:2223-34.
  2. Taylor A, Chaloupka F, Guindon E, The impact of trade liberalisation on tobacco consumption. In Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford University Press for The World Bank and World Health Organization 2000:333-364.
  3. McGrady B. TRIPs and trademarks: the case of tobacco. World Trade Rev 2004;3:53-82.
  4. Callard C, Chitanondh H, Weissman R. Why trade and investment liberalisation may threaten effective tobacco control efforts. Tob Control 2001;10:68-70.
  5. Shapiro IS. Treating cigarettes as an exception to the trade rules. SAIS Review, 2002;22, 187-96.
  6. Onzivu W. The public health implications of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Legal Regime on Tobacco Control. Aust J Asian Law 2002;4:160-87.
  7. Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, 15 Apr 1994. The legal texts: the results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations 4 (1999), 33 ILM 1144, 1994.
  8. Zhang P, Husten C. Impact of the Tobacco Price Support Program on tobacco control in the United States. Tob Control 1998;7:176-82.
  9. Bhagwati JN, Panagariya A, Srinivasan TN. Lectures on International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983:245-51.
  10. Gilmore AB, McKee M. Exploring the impact of foreign direct investment on tobacco consumption in the former Soviet Union, Tob Control 2005;14:13-21.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGrady, B.
Affiliations
Cancer Council Victoria (AU)
Corresponding author
McGrady, Benn
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-07-24
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
280-283
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2156679531
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
Keywords
trade liberalization, tobacco control, tobacco use, trade agreements, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Commerce, Humans, International Cooperation, Research, Tobacco Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review