The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US
Open accessAbstract
The issues related to tobacco harm reduction continue to challenge the tobacco control research and policy communities. The potential for combusting tobacco products to reduce exposure and risk remains largely unknown, but this has not stopped manufacturers from offering such products making these claims. The role of oral tobacco products in a harm reduction regimen has also been a source of dialogue and debate. Within the last few years, major cigarette manufacturing companies have begun selling smokeless products for the first time, claiming to target current cigarette smokers. Other cigarette manufacturers are also offering smokeless products in markets around the world. The harm reduction debate has at times been divisive. There has been no unifying set of principles or goals articulated to guide tobacco control efforts. In particular, the research needs are extraordinarily high in order to drive evidence-based policy in this area and avoid the mistakes made with “light” cigarettes. This paper discusses recommendations from a strategic dialogue held with key, mostly US-based tobacco control researchers and policy makers to develop a strategic vision and blueprint for research, policy and communications to reduce the harm from tobacco for the US. Short-term and long-term objectives are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harm reduction: come as you are.
Marlatt, G. A. (1996) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(96)00042-1 · Cited by 620
Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden
Foulds, J., Ramstrom, L., Burke, M., & Fagerström, K. (2003) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.12.4.349 · Cited by 471
Cited by
Cahn, Z., & Siegel, M. (2011) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.1057/jphp.2010.41 · Cited by 409
Goniewicz, M. L., Gawron, M., Smith, D. M., Peng, M., Jacob, P., & Benowitz, N. L. (2017) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw160 · Cited by 331
Current advances in research in treatment and recovery: Nicotine addiction
Prochaska, J. J., & Benowitz, N. L. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay9763 · Cited by 219
Borgerding, M. F., Bodnar, J. A., Curtin, G. M., & Swauger, J. E. (2012) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.09.003 · Cited by 102
The Nature, Scope, and Development of the Global Tobacco Control Epistemic Community
Mamudu, H. M., Gonzalez, M., & Glantz, S. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300303 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeller, M., & Hatsukami, D.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-02-24
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 324-332
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2114177025
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.2008.027318
- The paper
- Zeller, M., & Hatsukami, D. (2009). The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction: a vision and blueprint for action in the US. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.027318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.