Cited by 46Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationEconomic and Fiscal Studies

Follow the money: How the billions of dollars that flow from smokers in poor nations to companies in rich nations greatly exceed funding for global tobacco control and what might be done about it

Open access
Callard, Cynthia·2010·Tobacco Control

Abstract

The business of selling cigarettes is increasingly concentrated in the hands of five tobacco companies that collectively control almost 90% of the world's cigarette market, four of which are publicly traded corporations. The economic activities of these cigarette manufacturers can be monitored through their reports to shareholders and other public documents. Reports for 2008 show that the revenues of these five companies exceeded $300 billion, of which more than $160 billion was provided to governments as taxes, and that corporate earnings of the four publicly traded companies were over $25 billion, of which $14 billion was retained after corporate income taxes were paid. By contrast, funding for domestic and international tobacco control is not reliably reported. Estimated funding for global tobacco control in 2008, at $240 million, is significantly lower than resources provided to address other high-mortality global health challenges. Tobacco control has not yet benefited from the innovative finance mechanisms that are in place for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. The Framework Convention On Tobacco Control (FCTC) process could be used to redirect some of the earnings from transnational tobacco sales to fund FCTC implementation or other global health efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tc.2009.035071

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LMIC-based advocates may not feel able to advocate for structural changes, given the continual pressure to obtain scarce funding from international donors.

    “Our study is important as LMIC-based advocates may not feel able to advocate for such changes, given the continual pressure to obtain scarce funding from international donors.54 57 58”

    From Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews (2020) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results (Government investments in domestic and global tobacco control; page not provided) estimate that development assistance for tobacco control was likely no greater than $240 million, supporting the claim that funding is scarce. The paper does not address whether LMIC-based advocates feel unable to advocate for structural changes or face continual pressure to obtain donor funding. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]Pang T Guindon GE Globalization and risks to health. EMBO Rep 2007; 5(Suppl 1): S11– 16 15459728 PMC1299207
  2. [8]British American Tobacco Morgan Stanley Consumer Retail Conference; New York, 2008
  3. [11]Demirsar M Egypt's monopoly rakes in the profits, whetting the appetite of multinationals. Tob J Int. 2007; 2: 109– 110
  4. [18]Philip Morris International Presentation by Hermann Waldemer at the J.P. Morgan Global Tobacco Conference, 2009
  5. [24]Philip Morris International Remarks for CAGNY Conference by Hermann Waldemer, CFO. Philip Morris International, 2009
  6. [29]WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Secretariat(FCTC Secretariat) Review of existing and potential sources and mechanisms of assistance. Geneva: A/FCTC/COP/1/4, 2006
  7. [31]Decisions Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Durban, 2008
  8. [38]Mathers CD Loncar D Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Medicine. 2006; 3(11). PMC1664601 17132052
  9. [41]Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Press Release: ive nations and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation launch Advance Market Commitment for vaccines to combat deadly disease in poor nations. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 2007
  10. [49]Balbach ED Traynor MP Glantz SA The implementation of California's tobacco tax initiative: the critical role of outsider strategies in protecting Proposition 99. J Health Polit Policy Law 2000; 25: 689– 715 10979517

Authors
Callard, C.
Affiliations
Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Callard, Cynthia
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-07-29
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
285-290
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2111925414
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
tobacco industry, tobacco industry funding, corporate profits, tobacco taxation, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, innovative financing, public health funding, global health financing
MeSH terms
Commerce, Developing Countries, Humans, International Cooperation, Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review