Economic and public health impact of 2007–2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of the dynamic 2007–2010 tobacco tax policy in Ukraine on cigarette prices, cigarette consumption, tobacco tax revenue and the tobacco industry's price strategy. Methods: Using data on cigarette sales, cigarette prices, income and tobacco control policies, price elasticities of cigarette demand in Ukraine were estimated using two methods. Annual data were used to generate point price elasticity estimates, while monthly data were used in a two-step Engle–Granger procedure. Results: The point price elasticity estimate is data sensitive and ranges from −0.11 to −0.62, centring around −0.32. The regression model estimates a long-run price elasticity of −0.28. Cigarette consumption fell by 13% in 2009 and 15% in 2010 while the tax revenue increased by US$700 million and by US$500 million in 2009 and 2010, respectively, compared to the previous year. Tax increases have changed the tobacco industry's price strategy from one of shielding consumers from the impact of smaller tax hikes in 2007–2008, to one of increasing industry net-of-tax prices, after recent, larger tax increases. Conclusions: The higher real tobacco excise taxes of 2009 and 2010 have significantly reduced tobacco consumption in Ukraine, resulting in encouraging public health and fiscal gains. It will be important for cigarette prices/taxes to keep pace with inflation and income growth for this impact to be sustained.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite tax increases, Ukraine ranks among the bottom five countries for cigarette prices in Europe.
“Despite these increases, Ukraine ranks among the bottom five countries for cigarette prices in Europe.13–16”
From Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Tobacco companies have historically maintained low prices in Ukraine by undercutting each other, lobbying against tobacco tax increases, and absorbing small tax increases rather than passing them on to consumers.
“Tobacco companies have historically maintained low prices in Ukraine by undercutting each other to keep prices low, lobbying against legislation increasing tobacco taxes, and absorbing small tax increases rather than passing them on to consumers.13–15”
From Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
An international analysis of cigarette affordability
Blecher, E. H., & van Walbeek, C. P. (2004) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2003.006726 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weiger, C., Hoe, C., & Cohen, J. E. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049833 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ross, H., Stoklosa, M., & Krasovsky, K.
- Affiliations
- American Cancer Society (US)
- Ministry of Health (UA)
- Corresponding author
- Ross, Hana
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2011-06-14
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 429-435
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2103000312
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Keywords
- tobacco excise tax, tobacco taxation policy, cigarette prices, cigarette consumption, price elasticity, tobacco tax revenue, public health impact, fiscal impact, Ukraine
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Commerce, Humans, Income, Public Health, Smoking, Taxes, Ukraine, Models, Econometric, Tobacco Industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review