Cited by 38Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomic and Fiscal Studies

Economic and public health impact of 2007–2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine

Ross, Hana, Stoklosa, Michal, Krasovsky, Konstantin·2012·Tobacco Control

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the dynamic 2007–2010 tobacco tax policy in Ukraine on cigarette prices, cigarette consumption, tobacco tax revenue and the tobacco industry's price strategy. Methods: Using data on cigarette sales, cigarette prices, income and tobacco control policies, price elasticities of cigarette demand in Ukraine were estimated using two methods. Annual data were used to generate point price elasticity estimates, while monthly data were used in a two-step Engle–Granger procedure. Results: The point price elasticity estimate is data sensitive and ranges from −0.11 to −0.62, centring around −0.32. The regression model estimates a long-run price elasticity of −0.28. Cigarette consumption fell by 13% in 2009 and 15% in 2010 while the tax revenue increased by US$700 million and by US$500 million in 2009 and 2010, respectively, compared to the previous year. Tax increases have changed the tobacco industry's price strategy from one of shielding consumers from the impact of smaller tax hikes in 2007–2008, to one of increasing industry net-of-tax prices, after recent, larger tax increases. Conclusions: The higher real tobacco excise taxes of 2009 and 2010 have significantly reduced tobacco consumption in Ukraine, resulting in encouraging public health and fiscal gains. It will be important for cigarette prices/taxes to keep pace with inflation and income growth for this impact to be sustained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tc.2010.040071

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ross, H., Stoklosa, M., & Krasovsky, K.
Affiliations
  • American Cancer Society (US)
  • Ministry of Health (UA)
Corresponding author
Ross, Hana
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-06-14
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
429-435
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2103000312
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
tobacco excise tax, tobacco taxation policy, cigarette prices, cigarette consumption, price elasticity, tobacco tax revenue, public health impact, fiscal impact, Ukraine
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Commerce, Humans, Income, Public Health, Smoking, Taxes, Ukraine, Models, Econometric, Tobacco Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review