The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of cigarette smoking on inhaled corticosteroid treatment in mild asthma
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although inhaled corticosteroids have an established role in the treatment of asthma, studies have tended to concentrate on non-smokers and little is known about the possible effect of cigarette smoking on the efficacy of treatment with inhaled steroids in asthma. A study was undertaken to investigate the effect of active cigarette smoking on responses to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: The effect of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate (1000 microg daily) or placebo for 3 weeks was studied in a double blind, prospective, randomised, placebo controlled study of 38 steroid naïve adult asthmatic patients (21 non-smokers). Efficacy was assessed using morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) readings, spirometric parameters, bronchial hyperreactivity, and sputum eosinophil counts. Comparison was made between responses to treatment in non-smoking and smoking asthmatic patients. RESULTS: There was a significantly greater increase in mean morning PEF in non-smokers than in smokers following inhaled fluticasone (27 l/min v -5 l/min). Non-smokers had a statistically significant increase in mean morning PEF (27 l/min), mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (0.17 l), and geometric mean PC20 (2.6 doubling doses), and a significant decrease in the proportion of sputum eosinophils (-1.75%) after fluticasone compared with placebo. No significant changes were observed in the smoking asthmatic patients for any of these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Active cigarette smoking impairs the efficacy of short term inhaled corticosteroid treatment in mild asthma. This finding has important implications for the management of patients with mild asthma who smoke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma
Chung, K. F., Wenzel, S. E., Brozek, J. L., Bush, A., Castro, M., Sterk, P. J., Adcock, I. M., Bateman, E. D., Bel, E. H., Bleecker, E. R., et al. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00202013 · Cited by 3,926
Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary
Bateman, E. D., Hurd, S. S., Barnes, P. J., Bousquet, J., Drazen, J. M., FitzGerald, M., Gibson, P., Ohta, K., O'Byrne, P., Pedersen, S. E., et al. (2008) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00138707 · Cited by 3,203
How cigarette smoke skews immune responses to promote infection, lung disease and cancer
Stämpfli, M. R., & Anderson, G. P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2530 · Cited by 668
Diagnosis and treatment of asthma in childhood: a PRACTALL consensus report
Bacharier, L. B., Boner, A., Carlsen, K. ‐., Eigenmann, P. A., Frischer, T., Götz, M., Helms, P. J., Hunt, J., Liu, A., Papadopoulos, N., et al. (2008) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01586.x · Cited by 640
Thomson, N. C., Chaudhuri, R., & Livingston, E. (2004) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.04.00039004 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Chalmers, G. W.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226-230
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095591678
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of cigarette smoking on inhaled corticosteroid treatment in mild asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thorax.57.3.226
- The paper
- Chalmers, G. W. (2002). Influence of cigarette smoking on inhaled corticosteroid treatment in mild asthma. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.57.3.226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.