The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gender differences in prevalence, diagnosis and incidence of allergic and non-allergic asthma: a population-based cohort
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although women with severe non-allergic asthma may represent a substantial proportion of adults with asthma in clinical practice, gender differences in the incidence of allergic and non-allergic asthma have been little investigated in the general population. METHODS: Gender differences in asthma prevalence, reported diagnosis and incidence were investigated in 9091 men and women randomly selected from the general population and followed up after 8-10 years as part of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. The protocol included assessment of bronchial responsiveness, IgE specific to four common allergens and skin tests to nine allergens. RESULTS: Asthma was 20% more frequent in women than in men over the age of 35 years. Possible under-diagnosis of asthma appeared to be particularly frequent among non-atopic individuals, but was as frequent in women as in men. The follow-up of subjects without asthma at baseline showed a higher incidence of asthma in women than in men (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.40 to 2.68), which was not explained by differences in smoking, obesity or lung function. More than 60% of women and 30% of men with new-onset asthma were non-atopic. The incidence of non-allergic asthma was higher in women than in men throughout all the reproductive years (HR 3.51; 95% CI 2.21 to 5.58), whereas no gender difference was observed for the incidence of allergic asthma. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that female sex is an independent risk factor for non-allergic asthma, and stresses the need for more careful assessment of possible non-allergic asthma in clinical practice, in men and women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estrogen effects in allergy and asthma
Bonds, R. S., & Midoro-Horiuti, T. (2013) · Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1097/aci.0b013e32835a6dd6 · Cited by 208
Eosinophils in Autoimmune Diseases
Diny, N. L., Rose, N. R., & Čiháková, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00484 · Cited by 172
Asthma in reproductive-aged women with polycystic ovary syndrome and association with obesity
Htet, T. D., Teede, H. J., de Courten, B., Loxton, D., Real, F. G., Moran, L. J., & Joham, A. E. (2017) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01334-2016 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Leynaert, B., Sunyer, J., Garcia-Esteban, R., Svanes, C., Jarvis, D., Cerveri, I., Dratva, J., Gislason, T., Heinrich, J., Janson, C., Kuenzli, N., de Marco, R., Omenaas, E., Raherison, C., Gómez Real, F., Wjst, M., Zemp, E., Zureik, M., Burney, P. G. J., Anto, J. M., & Neukirch, F.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-02-14
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 625-631
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3296
- OpenAlex
- W2159262373
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.