Cited by 186Asthma and respiratory diseasesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeOccupational exposure and asthma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The cost of treating severe refractory asthma in the UK: an economic analysis from the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Registry

Open access
O'Neill, S., Sweeney, J., Patterson, C. C., Menzies-Gow, A., Niven, R., Mansur, A. H., Bucknall, C., Chaudhuri, R., Thomson, N. C., Brightling, C. E., O'Neill, C., Heaney, L. G., on behalf of the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Network·2015·Thorax

Abstract

Severe refractory asthma poses a substantial burden in terms of healthcare costs but relatively little is known about the factors which drive these costs. This study uses data from the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Registry (n=596) to estimate direct healthcare treatment costs from an National Health Service perspective and examines factors that explain variations in costs. Annual mean treatment costs among severe refractory asthma patients were £2912 (SD £2212) to £4217 (SD £2449). Significant predictors of costs were FEV1% predicted, location of care, maintenance oral corticosteroid treatment and body mass index. Treating individuals with severe refractory asthma presents a substantial cost to the health service.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204114

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breathlessness is an important outcome in asthma because it provides the patient with an alarm signal and is a vital component of self-monitoring.

    “Breathlessness is an important outcome in asthma since it provides the patient with an alarm signal, making a vital component of self-monitoring [1,23].”

    From A randomised controlled feasibility trial of Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for people with severe asthma (2017) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction describes an analysis of severe refractory asthma treatment costs, and the Methods and Results address healthcare use and cost drivers. Searches for breathlessness as an alarm signal or component of patient self-monitoring found no passage addressing that claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Neill, S., Sweeney, J., Patterson, C. C., Menzies-Gow, A., Niven, R., Mansur, A. H., Bucknall, C., Chaudhuri, R., Thomson, N. C., Brightling, C. E., O'Neill, C., Heaney, L. G., & on behalf of the British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Network
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • Heartlands Hospital (GB)
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Gartnavel General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Heaney, L. G.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-06-10
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
376-378
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171124311
Cited by
186
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
severe refractory asthma, health care costs, treatment costs, cost drivers, FEV1, oral corticosteroids, body mass index, location of care, National Health Service
MeSH terms
Adult, Asthma, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Glucocorticoids, United Kingdom, Health Services, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, State Medicine, Body Mass Index, Drug Costs, Health Care Costs, Anti-Asthmatic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review