The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis in the UK
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and sarcoidosis are common diagnoses in patients attending chest clinics, but little is known about the epidemiology of these diseases. We used data from a general practice database to provide information on the current incidence of IPF and sarcoidosis in the UK. METHODS: Data were extracted for all patients with a diagnosis of IPF or sarcoidosis between 1991 and 2003. The whole population of the database was used to calculate disease incidence stratified by age, sex, region, and time period. Poisson regression was used to compare the incidence between populations and Cox regression was used to compare survival between populations. RESULTS: 920 cases of IPF (mean age 71 years, 62% male) and 1019 cases of sarcoidosis (mean age 47 years, 47% male) were identified. The overall incidence rate per 100 000 person-years was 4.6 for IPF and 5.0 for sarcoidosis. The incidence of IPF increased progressively between 1991 and 2003 (p<0.00001), and was highest in Northern England and Scotland (p<0.0001). The survival of patients with IPF was stable over time. In contrast, the incidence of sarcoidosis was highest in London, West Midlands and Northern Ireland and remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IPF has more than doubled between 1990 and 2003; this is not due to the ageing of the UK population or an increased ascertainment of milder cases. The incidence of sarcoidosis has not changed during this time period. Our findings suggest that more than 4000 new cases of IPF and 3000 new cases of sarcoidosis are currently diagnosed each year in the UK.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racial Differences in Sarcoidosis Incidence: A 5-Year Study in a Health Maintenance Organization
Rybicki, B. A., Major, M., Popovich, J., Maliank, M. J., & lannuzzi, M. C. (1997) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009096 · Cited by 1,011
Cited by
Raghu, G., Collard, H. R., Egan, J. J., Martinez, F. J., Behr, J., Brown, K. K., Colby, T. V., Cordier, J.-F., Flaherty, K. R., Lasky, J. A., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.2009-040gl · Cited by 7,186
King, T. E., Pardo, A., & Selman, M. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60052-4 · Cited by 2,194
Valeyre, D., Prasse, A., Nunes, H., Uzunhan, Y., Brillet, P.-Y., & Müller-Quernheim, J. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60680-7 · Cited by 1,087
Global incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review
Hutchinson, J., Fogarty, A., Hubbard, R., & McKeever, T. (2015) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00185114 · Cited by 913
Self-citationUnderlying conditions in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis including simple aspergilloma
Smith, N. L., & Denning, D. W. (2011) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00054810 · Cited by 449
Metadata
- Authors
- Gribbin, J., Hubbard, R. B., Le Jeune, I., Smith, C. J. P., West, J., & Tata, L. J.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 980-985
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095947403
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis in the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.2006.062836
- The paper
- Gribbin, J., Hubbard, R. B., Le Jeune, I., Smith, C. J. P., West, J., & Tata, L. J. (2006). Incidence and mortality of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis in the UK. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.062836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.