Cited by 449Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityAsthma and respiratory diseasesFungal Infections and Studies

Underlying conditions in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis including simple aspergilloma

Open access
Smith, N.L., Denning, D.W.·2011·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a condition caused by the ubiquitous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus in non-immunocompromised individuals. Numerous underlying conditions have been associated with CPA. Details of the underlying conditions of 126 CPA patients attending our tertiary referral clinic from all over the UK were extracted from the clinical notes, and the distribution of these underlying conditions was analysed. For those with several underlying pulmonary conditions, one was nominated as the primary condition. Many patients presented with multiple underlying conditions, and a total of 232 underlying conditions were identified for the 126 patients. Previous classical tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection were the most common primary underlying conditions (15.3% and 14.9%, respectively). Others included allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), chronic obstructive pulmonary condition (COPD) and/or emphysema, pneumothorax and prior treated lung cancer. Some conditions were found more often as one of multiple underlying conditions, while others were found only as secondary underlying conditions. Tuberculosis, non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection and ABPA remain the predominant risk factors for development of CPA, with COPD, prior pneumothorax or treated lung cancer also relatively common among our referrals. Many patients have multiple underlying pulmonary conditions. CPA should be considered when upper lobe cavitary or fibrotic disease and systemic symptoms are present in those with lung disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00054810

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior TB is perhaps the most common underlying condition in CPA; post-tuberculous cases probably represent 50% (range 20-85%) of the total CPA caseload.

    “Prior TB is perhaps the most common underlying condition in, C.P.A.; post-tuberculous cases probably represent 50% (range 20–85%) [134] of the total CPA caseload”

    From Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases-Estimate Precision (2017) · cites this paper as [134]

    The Tuberculosis section (page unavailable) identifies tuberculosis as the most common primary underlying condition in this cohort and reports 50–72% in some earlier studies. It does not estimate that post-tuberculous cases make up 50% (range 20–85%) of the total CPA caseload; its own figure is 30.2%, combining classical tuberculosis with nontuberculous mycobacterial infection. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]19. Israel RH, Poe RH, Bomba PA, et al. The rapid development of an aspergilloma secondary to allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillo- sis. Am J Med Sci 1980; 280: 41-44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, N. L., & Denning, D. W.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Denning, D.W.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
865-872
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2144901153
Cited by
449
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, Aspergillus fumigatus, tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, pneumothorax, lung cancer, risk factors, cavitary lung disease, fibrotic lung disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aspergillosis, Aspergillus fumigatus, Emphysema, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumothorax, Itraconazole, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Pulmonary Aspergillosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review