Cited by 30Influenza Virus Research StudiesRespiratory viral infections researchCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Clinical characteristics of fatalities due to influenza A (H1N1) virus in Mexico

Open access
Fajardo-Dolci, G., Gutierrez-Vega, R., Arboleya-Casanova, H., Villalobos, A., Wilson, K. S., Garcia, S. G., Sotelo, J., Cordova Villalobos, J. A. +1 more·2010·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mexico has experienced a disproportionate mortality burden due to the influenza A(HIN1) pandemic. A study was undertaken to investigate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the first 100 patients who died from confirmed influenza A(H1N1). METHODS: A clinical evaluation was made of the first 100 consecutive deaths of confirmed cases between 10 April and 28 May 2009 reported by the Federal Ministry of Health. Statistical analysis included disease frequencies and descriptive comparisons with national health data. RESULTS: Most patients (60%) were aged 30-79 years, 53% were female and 40% were residents of Mexico City. On admission, 50% had one or more chronic medical conditions including metabolic syndrome (40%), cardiovascular disease (21%), diabetes (20%), hypertension (20%) and respiratory disease (8%). 38% of women and 26% of men were obese based on body mass index). The main clinical symptoms were fever (84%), cough (85%), dyspnoea (75%) and myalgia (30%). The frequency of all chronic diseases was higher in this sample than in the national statistics. Most (82%) developed symptoms before the Mexican government issued the influenza alert (24 April). Median hospital stay prior to death was 4 days (range 0-58). CONCLUSIONS: Patients, mostly young adults, who died from A(HIN1) influenza had a high frequency of one or more chronic diseases upon admission. Most died shortly after the health authorities initiated national influenza control measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.2009.126953

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the first 100 confirmed deaths in Mexico, only 2 cases had positive bacterial cultures (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus hominis).

    “The lowest proportion of co-infection was reported in the first 100 confirmed deaths in Mexico [14] where 94% of patients had multiple foci of pneumonia (based on imaging) and 84% required mechanical ventilation, and only 2 cases had positive bacterial cultures (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus hominis).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Respiratory infection on August 10, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.2009.126953 on 3 June 2010. Downloaded from Respiratory infection on August 10, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.2009.126953 on 3 June 2010. Downloaded from Respiratory infection on August 10, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.2009.126953 on 3 June 2010. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update: novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infections e worldwide, May 6, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:453e8.
  3. Raloff J. Obesity may aggravate flu. Science News 2005;17:269.
  4. Fajardo-Dolci GE, Herna ´ndez-Torres F, Santacruz-Varela J, et al. (Epidemiological profile of mortality due to human influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico). Salud Publica Mex 2009;51:361e71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fajardo-Dolci, G., Gutierrez-Vega, R., Arboleya-Casanova, H., Villalobos, A., Wilson, K. S., Garcia, S. G., Sotelo, J., Cordova Villalobos, J. A., & Diaz-Olavarrieta, C.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
505-509
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150890883
Cited by
30
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r21tw006786-01)
  • Fogarty International Center (1R21TW06786-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic, influenza mortality, sociodemographic factors, chronic comorbidities, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, respiratory symptoms, Mexico
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Mexico, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review