The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell counts in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and their relation to therapy.
Open accessAbstract
Bronchoalveolar lavage was used to sample inflammatory cells from the lungs of 51 patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (CFA) (24 smokers, 12 ex-smokers, and 15 non-smokers). The smokers with CFA have been compared with 15 smoking control subjects in whom there was no radiographic abnormality or clinical evidence of chronic bronchitis. Significantly lower volumes of lavage fluid were recovered from the smokers with CFA (p < 0.001) and the fluid contained lower percentages of macrophages (p < 0.01), reflecting increased percentages of eosinophils (p < 0.001) and neutrophils (p < 0.01). Similar changes were seen in the ex-smokers and non-smokers. There was also an increase in the percentages of lymphocytes when the whole group of CFA patients was compared with the control subjects (p less than or equal to 0.05). No significant differences were found when patients with "lone" CFA were compared with those having associated systemic disease. The only feature distinguishing smokers from non-smokers with CFA was the presence of pigmented cytoplasmic inclusions in the macrophages from the smokers (p < 0.001). However, there were lower numbers of pigmented macrophages in the smoking CFA patients by comparison with the control subjects suggesting either a change in phagocytic capacity or turnover rate in this disease. Profiles of differential cell counts in individual patients showed that increases of eosinophils over 3% or neutrophils over 4% or both with lymphocyte counts of less than 11% related to a poor clinical response to corticosteroids, but lymphocyte percentages greater than 11% related to improvement (p < 0.05).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Treatment: International Consensus Statement
(2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.ats3-00 · Cited by 2,628
Baseline BAL Neutrophilia Predicts Early Mortality in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Kinder, B. W., Brown, K. K., Schwarz, M. I., Ix, J. H., Kervitsky, A., & King, T. E. (2008) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.07-1948 · Cited by 302
Kohno, N., Awaya, Y., Oyama, T., Yamakido, M., Akiyama, M., Inoue, Y., Yokoyama, A., Hamada, H., Fujioka, S., & Hiwada, K. (1993) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.637 · Cited by 286
Carré, P. C., Mortenson, R. L., King, T. E., Noble, P. W., Sable, C. L., & Riches, D. W. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci115501 · Cited by 253
Fireman, E., Vardinon, N., Burke, M., Spizer, S., Levin, S., Endler, A., Stav, D., Topilsky, M., Mann, A., Schwarz, Y., et al. (1998) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.98.11030706 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Haslam, P. L., Turton, C. W., Lukoszek, A., Salsbury, A. J., Dewar, A., Collins, J. V., & Turner-Warwick, M.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1980-05-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 328-339
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005497672
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell counts in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and their relation to therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.35.5.328
- The paper
- Haslam, P. L., Turton, C. W., Lukoszek, A., Salsbury, A. J., Dewar, A., Collins, J. V., & Turner-Warwick, M. (1980). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell counts in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and their relation to therapy. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.35.5.328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.