The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of induced sputum cell counts to investigate airway inflammation in asthma.
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Airway inflammation is considered to be important in asthma but is relatively inaccessible to study. Less invasive methods of obtaining sputum from patients unable to produce it spontaneously should provide a useful investigational tool in asthma. METHODS: A method to induce sputum with inhaled hypertonic saline was modified for use in 17 asthmatic patients and 17 normal subjects who could not produce sputum spontaneously. The success rate and safety of the method, the reproducibility of cell counts, and differences in cell counts between the asthmatic and normal groups were examined. Hypertonic saline solution 3-5% was inhaled for up to 30 minutes after inhalation of salbutamol. Subjects were asked to expectorate sputum every five minutes. The quality of the sample was scored on the volume of plugs and the extent of salivary contamination. Plugs from the lower respiratory tract were selected for a total cell count and for differential cell counts of eosinophils and metachromatic cells (mast cells and basophils) in direct smears. RESULTS: Adequate samples from the lower respiratory tract were obtained in 76% of first attempts. The mean fall in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) during inhalation of saline was 5.3% and the maximum fall 20%. Eosinophil and metachromatic cell counts were reproducible (reliability coefficient 0.8 and 0.7 respectively). When compared with sputum from normal subjects sputum from asthmatic patients contained a significantly higher proportion of eosinophils (mean 18.5% (SE 3.8%) v 1.9% (0.6%)) and metachromatic cells (0.50% (0.18%) v 0.039% (0.014%)). In the asthmatic group the differential eosinophil count correlated with the baseline FEV1. CONCLUSION: Induced sputum is capable of detecting differences in cell counts between normal and asthmatic subjects and merits further development as a potential means of assessing airway inflammation in asthma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of induced sputum to investigate airway inflammation
Pavord, I. D., Pizzichini, M. M., Pizzichini, E., & Hargreave, F. E. (1997) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.52.6.498 · Cited by 420
Self-citationInduced Sputum Cell Counts in Healthy Adults
BELDA, J., LEIGH, R., PARAMESWARAN, K., O'BYRNE, P. M., SEARS, M. R., & HARGREAVE, F. E. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9903097 · Cited by 389
Self-citationHelenius, I. J., Rytilä, P., Metso, T., Haahtela, T., Venge, P., & Tikkanen, H. O. (1998) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03904.x · Cited by 201
SCH527123, a novel CXCR2 antagonist, inhibits ozone-induced neutrophilia in healthy subjects
Holz, O., Khalilieh, S., Ludwig-Sengpiel, A., Watz, H., Stryszak, P., Soni, P., Tsai, M., Sadeh, J., & Magnussen, H. (2010) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00048509 · Cited by 183
Hyperventilation and asymptomatic chronic asthma
Osborne, C. A. (2000) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.55.12.1016 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Pin, I., Gibson, P. G., Kolendowicz, R., Girgis-Gabardo, A., Denburg, J. A., Hargreave, F. E., & Dolovich, J.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-29
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109781176
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of induced sputum cell counts to investigate airway inflammation in asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.47.1.25
- The paper
- Pin, I., Gibson, P. G., Kolendowicz, R., Girgis-Gabardo, A., Denburg, J. A., Hargreave, F. E., & Dolovich, J. (1992). Use of induced sputum cell counts to investigate airway inflammation in asthma. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.47.1.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.