Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Malignant mesothelioma in women.

Dawson, A, Gibbs, A R, Pooley, F D, Griffiths, D M, Hoy, J·1993·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant mesothelioma reportedly shows different epidemiology and pathology in females, and a proportion are believed to arise spontaneously. METHODS: One hundred and seventy seven cases of malignant mesothelioma in females were reviewed, examined by histochemistry and immunohistochemistry, assessed for asbestosis and lung fibre burden by transmission electron microscopy with energy dispersive x ray analysis, and compared with 31 female controls. RESULTS: Two of one hundred and three cases tested for carcinoembryonic antigen were positive and were excluded from further analysis. Tumour cases showed increased amphibole burdens; in those in whom exposure information was known, 74 (80%) of 93 patients had a history of exposure to asbestos. Seventy two (47%) of 152 patients had lung fibrosis. Tumour site and histological type were little different from those reported in adult males. Mixed type histological pattern, lung fibrosis, and peritoneal site were associated with heavier lung asbestos burdens, but not exclusively. Thirty five (30%) of 117 patients had amphibole burdens of less than 2 x 10(6) fibres/g; the sites affected and the histological pattern of tumours in this group were similar to those in cases with amphibole fibre counts of > or = 2 x 10(6)/g lung. A higher lung amphibole burden than the mean burden in control females was found in 115 (98%) of 117 patients tested. CONCLUSIONS: The pathology of malignant mesothelioma appears to be similar in women and in men, and in cases associated and unassociated with asbestos.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.48.3.269

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hillerdal G. Malignant mesothelioma 1982: review of
  2. Adams VI, Unni KK, Muhm JR, Jett JR, Ilstrup DM, Bernatz PE. Diffuse malignant mesothelioma of pleura. Cancer 1986;58: 1540-51. · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19861001)58:7<1540::aid-cncr2820580727>3.0.co;2-5
  3. Rowlands N, Gibbs GW, McDonald JC. Asbestos fibres in the lungs of chrysotile miners and millers. Ann Occup Hyg 1982;26:411-15.
  4. Peterson JT, Greenberg SD, Buffier PA. Non-asbestos related malignant mesothelioma. Cancer 1984;54:95 1-60.

Cited by

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
Dawson, A., Gibbs, A. R., Pooley, F. D., Griffiths, D. M., & Hoy, J.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1993-03-01
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
269-274
ISSN
0040-6376
Cited by
31
References
48
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Malignant mesothelioma in women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.48.3.269
The paper
Dawson, A., Gibbs, A. R., Pooley, F. D., Griffiths, D. M., & Hoy, J. (1993). Malignant mesothelioma in women. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.48.3.269

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.