Tobacco control in Namibia: the importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference: Table 1
Abstract
Background Namibia is typical of low-income and middle-income countries with growing tobacco use, but with limited capacity to impose comprehensive tobacco control legislation. Despite initiating dialogue on national tobacco control policy in 1991, the country took nearly 20 years to pass the Tobacco Products Control Act. Objective To use Namibia as a case study to illustrate challenges faced by low-income countries working to forward tobacco control legislation. Method Face-to-face and telephonic interviews were conducted with 13 bureaucrats and advocates currently or previously engaged in tobacco-related work in Namibia. Tobacco-related news articles from national newspapers were examined. Results The constitutional obligation of the government to promote public health laid the foundation for Namibia's tobacco control policy. Staff capacity constraints greatly delayed the passing of tobacco control legislation. It is unclear what influence the tobacco industry's involvement as a stakeholder had on policy; however, in at least one instance, the tobacco industry actively misled government. Namibia's ratification of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control was instrumental in passing legislation that meets most provisions of the international treaty. The media have generally played a supportive role in pushing the government to pass tobacco control legislation. Conclusions The fact that Namibia was able to pass fairly comprehensive tobacco control legislation with such meag…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The activities advocates engage in to counter tobacco industry interference are aligned with those outlined in the literature on countering tobacco industry interference in LMICs, HICs and supranational settings, and directly address some of the main tobacco industry interference tactics, most notably producing and disseminating information, seeking direct access to policymakers and using front g
“The activities are aligned with those outlined in the literature on countering TII in LMICs,16–19 27–30 HICs31 32 and supranational settings,33 and directly addressing some of the main TII tactics, most notably, producing and disseminating information, seeking direct access to policymakers and using front groups and third parties.9 13–15 34”
From Needs of LMIC-based tobacco control advocates to counter tobacco industry policy interference: insights from semi-structured interviews (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries
Gilmore, A. B., Fooks, G., Drope, J., Bialous, S. A., & Jackson, R. R. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60312-9 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Matthes, B. K., Robertson, L., & Gilmore, A. B. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044710 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tam, J., & van Walbeek, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tam, Jamie
- ORCID
- Tam, Jamie
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-06-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 518-523
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2165190319
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- tobacco control legislation, state capacity, media coverage, tobacco industry interference, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, tobacco control, low-income countries, Namibia
- MeSH terms
- Developing Countries, Health Policy, Humans, Lobbying, Mass Media, Public Health, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Industry, Government Regulation, Federal Government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review