Cited by 36Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationPublic Health Policies and Education

Tobacco control in Namibia: the importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference: Table 1

Tam, Jamie, van Walbeek, Corné·2014·Tobacco Control

Abstract

Background Namibia is typical of low-income and middle-income countries with growing tobacco use, but with limited capacity to impose comprehensive tobacco control legislation. Despite initiating dialogue on national tobacco control policy in 1991, the country took nearly 20 years to pass the Tobacco Products Control Act. Objective To use Namibia as a case study to illustrate challenges faced by low-income countries working to forward tobacco control legislation. Method Face-to-face and telephonic interviews were conducted with 13 bureaucrats and advocates currently or previously engaged in tobacco-related work in Namibia. Tobacco-related news articles from national newspapers were examined. Results The constitutional obligation of the government to promote public health laid the foundation for Namibia's tobacco control policy. Staff capacity constraints greatly delayed the passing of tobacco control legislation. It is unclear what influence the tobacco industry's involvement as a stakeholder had on policy; however, in at least one instance, the tobacco industry actively misled government. Namibia's ratification of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control was instrumental in passing legislation that meets most provisions of the international treaty. The media have generally played a supportive role in pushing the government to pass tobacco control legislation. Conclusions The fact that Namibia was able to pass fairly comprehensive tobacco control legislation with such meag…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050725

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The activities advocates engage in to counter tobacco industry interference are aligned with those outlined in the literature on countering tobacco industry interference in LMICs, HICs and supranational settings, and directly address some of the main tobacco industry interference tactics, most notably producing and disseminating information, seeking direct access to policymakers and using front g

    “The activities are aligned with those outlined in the literature on countering TII in LMICs,16–19 27–30 HICs31 32 and supranational settings,33 and directly addressing some of the main TII tactics, most notably, producing and disseminating information, seeking direct access to policymakers and using front groups and third parties.9 13–15 34”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tam, J., & van Walbeek, C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Tam, Jamie
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
518-523
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2165190319
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
tobacco control legislation, state capacity, media coverage, tobacco industry interference, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, tobacco control, low-income countries, Namibia
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Health Policy, Humans, Lobbying, Mass Media, Public Health, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Industry, Government Regulation, Federal Government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review