The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tobacco on the web: surveillance and characterisation of online tobacco and e-cigarette advertising
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the internet's broad reach and potential to influence consumer behaviour, there has been little examination of the volume, characteristics, and target audience of online tobacco and e-cigarette advertisements. METHODS: A full-service advertising firm was used to collect all online banner/video advertisements occurring in the USA and Canada between 1 April 2012 and 1 April 2013. The advertisement and associated meta-data on brand, date range observed, first market, and spend were downloaded and summarised. Characteristics and themes of advertisements, as well as topic area and target demographics of websites on which advertisements appeared, were also examined. RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, almost $2 million were spent by the e-cigarette and tobacco industries on the placement of their online product advertisements in the USA and Canada. Most was spent promoting two brands: NJOY e-cigarettes and Swedish Snus. There was almost no advertising of cigarettes. About 30% of all advertisements mentioned a price promotion, discount coupon or price break. e-Cigarette advertisements were most likely to feature messages of harm reduction (38%) or use for cessation (21%). Certain brands advertised on websites that contained up to 35% of youth (<18 years) as their audience. CONCLUSIONS: Online banner/video advertising is a tactic used mainly to advertise e-cigarettes and cigars rather than cigarettes, some with unproven claims about benefits to health. Given the reach and accessibility of online advertising to vulnerable populations such as youth and the potential for health claims to be misinterpreted, online advertisements need to be closely monitored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How advertising works: what do we really know?
Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300103 · Cited by 1,436
Hopkins, D. P., Husten, C. G., Fielding, J. E., Rosenquist, J. N., & Westphal, L. L. (2001) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00298-1 · Cited by 82
Should electronic cigarettes be as freely available as tobacco cigarettes? No
Chapman, S. (2013) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.f3840 · Cited by 75
Cited by
Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation
Zhu, S.-H., Sun, J. Y., Bonnevie, E., Cummins, S. E., Gamst, A., Yin, L., & Lee, M. (2014) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051670 · Cited by 913
Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review
Glasser, A. M., Collins, L., Pearson, J. L., Abudayyeh, H., Niaura, R. S., Abrams, D. B., & Villanti, A. C. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.036 · Cited by 473
Collins, L., Glasser, A. M., Abudayyeh, H., Pearson, J. L., & Villanti, A. C. (2019) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx284 · Cited by 308
Wills, T. A., Knight, R., Sargent, J. D., Gibbons, F. X., Pagano, I., & Williams, R. J. (2017) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052705 · Cited by 288
Media/marketing influences on adolescent and young adult substance abuse
Jackson, K. M., Janssen, T., & Gabrielli, J. (2018) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-018-0199-6 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, A., Ganz, O., & Vallone, D.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2014-02-14
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 341-347
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2127476447
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tobacco on the web: surveillance and characterisation of online tobacco and e-cigarette advertising. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051246
- The paper
- Richardson, A., Ganz, O., & Vallone, D. (2015). Tobacco on the web: surveillance and characterisation of online tobacco and e-cigarette advertising. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.