CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 82Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPublic Health Policies and Education

Evidence reviews and recommendations on interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

Hopkins, David P, Husten, Corinne G, Fielding, Jonathan E, Rosenquist, J.Niels, Westphal, Lori L·2001·American Journal of Preventive Medicine
DOI 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00298-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00298-1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several authors have suggested that translation of research findings into real-world interventions could be hastened by a strategy that builds translation potential into initial treatment evaluation.

    “Several authors (e.g., (3, 40–43)) have suggested that the process of translating research findings into real-world interventions could be hastened through the use of a strategy that builds translation potential into initial treatment evaluation.”

    From The Multiphase Optimization Strategy for Engineering Effective Tobacco Use Interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [43]

  • According to these authors, successful translation of smoking cessation interventions depends on three criteria: ease of delivery, effectiveness in real-world settings, and compatibility and integration with real-world delivery systems.

    “According to these authors successful translation of smoking cessation interventions depends upon three criteria: (a) ease of delivery; (b) effectiveness in real-world settings; and (c) compatibility and integration with real-world delivery systems.”

    From The Multiphase Optimization Strategy for Engineering Effective Tobacco Use Interventions (2011) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hopkins, D. P., Husten, C. G., Fielding, J. E., Rosenquist, J. N., & Westphal, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (US)
Corresponding author
Hopkins, David P
ORCID
Hopkins, David P
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
67-87
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00298-1
OpenAlex
W1985258740
Cited by
82
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
tobacco use reduction, environmental tobacco smoke, passive smoking, smoking cessation interventions, community preventive services, evidence-based recommendations, smoking prevention
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Community Health Services, Humans, Preventive Health Services, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, United States, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review