Distributional health and financial benefits of increased tobacco taxes in Colombia: results from a modelling study
Open accessAbstract
Background: In Colombia, smoking is the second leading modifiable risk factor for premature mortality. In December 2016, Colombia passed a major tax increase on tobacco products in an effort to decrease smoking and improve population health. While tobacco taxes are known to be highly effective in reducing the prevalence of smoking, they are often criticised as being regressive in consumption. This analysis attempts to assess the distributional impact (across socioeconomic groups) of the new tax on selected health and financial outcomes. Methods: This study builds on extended cost-effectiveness analysis methods to study the new tobacco tax in Colombia, and estimates, over a time period of 20 years and across income quintiles of the current urban population (80% of the country population), the years of life gained with smoking cessation and the increased tax revenues, all associated with a 70% relative price increase of the pack of cigarettes. Where possible, we use parameters that vary by income quintile, including price elasticity of demand for cigarettes (average of −0.44 estimated from household survey data). Findings: Over 20 years, the tax increase would lead to an estimated 191 000 years of life gained among Colombia’s current urban population, with the largest gains among the bottom two income quintiles. The additional annual tax revenues raised would amount to about 2%–4% of Colombia’s annual government health expenditure, with the poorest quintiles bearing the smallest tax burden increase. Conclusions: The tobacco tax increase passed by Colombia has substantial implications for the country’s population health and financial well-being, with large benefits likely to accrue to the two poorest quintiles of the population.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several extended cost-effectiveness analyses have established that the overall impact of increased tobacco taxes is progressive when accounting for outcomes of health benefits and financial risk protection.
“Several extended cost-effectiveness analyses have established this: the overall impact of increased tobacco taxes is progressive when accounting for outcomes of health benefits and financial risk protection.223–229”
From Global health 2050: the path to halving premature death by mid-century (2024) · cites this paper as [227]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors
Doll, R., Peto, R., Boreham, J., & Sutherland, I. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.ae · Cited by 2,920 · see citing works
Verguet, S., Gauvreau, C. L., Mishra, S., MacLennan, M., Murphy, S. M., Brouwer, E. D., Nugent, R. A., Zhao, K., Jha, P., & Jamison, D. T. (2015) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(15)70095-1 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global health 2050: the path to halving premature death by mid-century
Jamison, D. T., Summers, L. H., Chang, A. Y., Karlsson, O., Mao, W., Norheim, O. F., Ogbuoji, O., Schäferhoff, M., Watkins, D., Adeyi, O., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01439-9 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationSaxena, A., Koon, A. D., Lagrada-Rombaua, L., Angeles-Agdeppa, I., Johns, B., & Capanzana, M. (2019) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.18.219980 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationVerguet, S., Kearns, P. K. A., & Rees, V. W. (2021) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055315 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- James, E. K., Saxena, A., Franco Restrepo, C., Llorente, B., Vecino-Ortiz, A. I., Villar Uribe, M., Iunes, R. F., & Verguet, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- World Bank (US)
- Corresponding author
- Verguet, Stéphane
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-08-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-380
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2887101570
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Tobacco Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- World Bank Group
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Keywords
- tobacco taxation, tobacco tax increase, smoking cessation, life-years gained, regressive taxation, income distribution, tax revenue, health care costs, tobacco control
- MeSH terms
- Tobacco Smoking, Smoking Prevention, Population Health, Colombia, Commerce, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Income, Taxes, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Products
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review