Cited by 28Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomic and Fiscal Studies

Distributional health and financial benefits of increased tobacco taxes in Colombia: results from a modelling study

Open access
James, Erin Kinsella, Saxena, Akshar, Franco Restrepo, Camila, Llorente, Blanca, Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I, Villar Uribe, Manuela, Iunes, Roberto F, Verguet, Stéphane·2019·Tobacco Control

Abstract

Background: In Colombia, smoking is the second leading modifiable risk factor for premature mortality. In December 2016, Colombia passed a major tax increase on tobacco products in an effort to decrease smoking and improve population health. While tobacco taxes are known to be highly effective in reducing the prevalence of smoking, they are often criticised as being regressive in consumption. This analysis attempts to assess the distributional impact (across socioeconomic groups) of the new tax on selected health and financial outcomes. Methods: This study builds on extended cost-effectiveness analysis methods to study the new tobacco tax in Colombia, and estimates, over a time period of 20 years and across income quintiles of the current urban population (80% of the country population), the years of life gained with smoking cessation and the increased tax revenues, all associated with a 70% relative price increase of the pack of cigarettes. Where possible, we use parameters that vary by income quintile, including price elasticity of demand for cigarettes (average of −0.44 estimated from household survey data). Findings: Over 20 years, the tax increase would lead to an estimated 191 000 years of life gained among Colombia’s current urban population, with the largest gains among the bottom two income quintiles. The additional annual tax revenues raised would amount to about 2%–4% of Colombia’s annual government health expenditure, with the poorest quintiles bearing the smallest tax burden increase. Conclusions: The tobacco tax increase passed by Colombia has substantial implications for the country’s population health and financial well-being, with large benefits likely to accrue to the two poorest quintiles of the population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054378

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several extended cost-effectiveness analyses have established that the overall impact of increased tobacco taxes is progressive when accounting for outcomes of health benefits and financial risk protection.

    “Several extended cost-effectiveness analyses have established this: the overall impact of increased tobacco taxes is progressive when accounting for outcomes of health benefits and financial risk protection.223–229”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
James, E. K., Saxena, A., Franco Restrepo, C., Llorente, B., Vecino-Ortiz, A. I., Villar Uribe, M., Iunes, R. F., & Verguet, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • World Bank (US)
Corresponding author
Verguet, Stéphane
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-08-09
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
374-380
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2887101570
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Bank Group
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
tobacco taxation, tobacco tax increase, smoking cessation, life-years gained, regressive taxation, income distribution, tax revenue, health care costs, tobacco control
MeSH terms
Tobacco Smoking, Smoking Prevention, Population Health, Colombia, Commerce, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Income, Taxes, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review