Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained Optimization

Audet, Charles, Dennis, J. E.·2006·SIAM Journal on Optimization

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of minimization of a nonsmooth function under general nonsmooth constraints when no derivatives of the objective or constraint functions are available. We introduce the mesh adaptive direct search (MADS) class of algorithms which extends the generalized pattern search (GPS) class by allowing local exploration, called polling, in an asymptotically dense set of directions in the space of optimization variables. This means that under certain hypotheses, including a weak constraint qualification due to Rockafellar, MADS can treat constraints by the extreme barrier approach of setting the objective to infinity for infeasible points and treating the problem as unconstrained. The main GPS convergence result is to identify limit points $\hat{x}$, where the Clarke generalized derivatives are nonnegative in a finite set of directions, called refining directions. Although in the unconstrained case, nonnegative combinations of these directions span the whole space, the fact that there can only be finitely many GPS refining directions limits rigorous justification of the barrier approach to finitely many linear constraints for GPS. The main result of this paper is that the general MADS framework is flexible enough to allow the generation of an asymptotically dense set of refining directions along which the Clarke derivatives are nonnegative. We propose an instance of MADS for which the refining directions are dense in the hypertangent cone at $\hat{x}$ with probability 1 whenever the iterates associated with the refining directions converge to a single $\hat{x}$. The instance of MADS is compared to versions of GPS on some test problems. We also illustrate the limitation of our results with examples. An erratum to this article has been appended at the end of the pdf file.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/040603371

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 1,243

Metadata

Authors
Audet, C., & Dennis, J. E.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Optimization
Published
2006-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
188-217
ISSN
  • 1052-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7189
OpenAlex
W1998855065
Cited by
1,243
References
17
FWCI
33.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/040603371
The paper
Audet, C., & Dennis, J. E. (2006). Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained Optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/040603371

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.