The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization by Direct Search: New Perspectives on Some Classical and Modern Methods
Abstract
Direct search methods are best known as unconstrained optimization techniques that do not explicitly use derivatives. Direct search methods were formally proposed and widely applied in the 1960s but fell out of favor with the mathematical optimization community by the early 1970s because they lacked coherent mathematical analysis. Nonetheless, users remained loyal to these methods, most of which were easy to program, some of which were reliable. In the past fifteen years, these methods have seen a revival due, in part, to the appearance of mathematical analysis, as well as to interest in parallel and distributed computing. This review begins by briefly summarizing the history of direct search methods and considering the special properties of problems for which they are well suited. Our focus then turns to a broad class of methods for which we provide a unifying framework that lends itself to a variety of convergence results. The underlying principles allow generalization to handle bound constraints and linear constraints. We also discuss extensions to problems with nonlinear constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Powell, M. J. D. (1964) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.2.155 · Cited by 4,632 · cited 1×
“After evaluating f over the current lattice M, why not use the information accumulated during this search on M to construct a new set of generators that attempt to capture, at least locally, some curvature information? This is in the spirit of several of the early direct search methods such as Rosenbrock’s method of r…”
MethodPowell, M. J. D. (1994) · Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8330-5_4 · Cited by 1,369
Cited by
Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images
Fridrich, J., & Kodovsky, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2190402 · Cited by 2,144
Quantum computational chemistry
McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003 · Cited by 1,621
Derivative-free optimization: a review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations
Rios, L. M., & Sahinidis, N. V. (2013) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-012-9951-y · Cited by 1,276
Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained Optimization
Audet, C., & Dennis, J. E. (2006) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/040603371 · Cited by 1,243
Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Nelson, B., Rubinstein, B. I. P., & Tygar, J. D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Security and artificial intelligence · doi:10.1145/2046684.2046692 · Cited by 1,194
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolda, T. G., Lewis, R. M., & Torczon, V.
- Venue
- SIAM Review
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-482
- ISSN
- 0036-1445 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7200
- OpenAlex
- W2162737890
- Cited by
- 1,653
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization by Direct Search: New Perspectives on Some Classical and Modern Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/s003614450242889
- The paper
- Kolda, T. G., Lewis, R. M., & Torczon, V. (2003). Optimization by Direct Search: New Perspectives on Some Classical and Modern Methods. SIAM Review. https://doi.org/10.1137/s003614450242889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.