Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Second-order Cone Programming Methods for Total Variation-Based Image Restoration

Goldfarb, Donald, Yin, Wotao·2005·SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Abstract

In this paper we present optimization algorithms for image restoration based on the total variation (TV) minimization framework of Rudin, Osher, and Fatemi (ROF). Our approach formulates TV minimization as a second-order cone program which is then solved by interior-point algorithms that are efficient both in practice (using nested dissection and domain decomposition) and in theory (i.e., they obtain solutions in polynomial time). In addition to the original ROF minimization model, we show how to apply our approach to other TV models, including ones that are not solvable by PDE-based methods. Numerical results on a varied set of images are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/040608982

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Goldfarb, D., & Yin, W.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
Published
2005-01
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
622-645
ISSN
  • 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7197
OpenAlex
W2061979078
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
19.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second-order Cone Programming Methods for Total Variation-Based Image Restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/040608982
The paper
Goldfarb, D., & Yin, W. (2005). Second-order Cone Programming Methods for Total Variation-Based Image Restoration. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/040608982

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.