The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convex Approximations of Chance Constrained Programs
Abstract
We consider a chance constrained problem, where one seeks to minimize a convex objective over solutions satisfying, with a given close to one probability, a system of randomly perturbed convex constraints. This problem may happen to be computationally intractable; our goal is to build its computationally tractable approximation, i.e., an efficiently solvable deterministic optimization program with the feasible set contained in the chance constrained problem. We construct a general class of such convex conservative approximations of the corresponding chance constrained problem. Moreover, under the assumptions that the constraints are affine in the perturbations and the entries in the perturbation vector are independent‐of‐each‐other random variables, we build a large deviation‐type approximation, referred to as “Bernstein approximation,” of the chance constrained problem. This approximation is convex and efficiently solvable. We propose a simulation‐based scheme for bounding the optimal value in the chance constrained problem and report numerical experiments aimed at comparing the Bernstein and well‐known scenario approximation approaches. Finally, we extend our construction to the case of ambiguous chance constrained problems, where the random perturbations are independent with the collection of distributions known to belong to a given convex compact set rather than to be known exactly, while the chance constraint should be satisfied for every distribution given by this set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust optimization ? methodology and applications
Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (2002) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s101070100286 · Cited by 1,409
Self-citation
Cited by
Infrastructure planning for electric vehicles with battery swapping
Mak, H.-Y., Rong, Y., & Shen, Z.-J. M. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1672 · Cited by 570
MIMO Transceiver Design via Majorization Theory
Palomar, D. P., & Jiang, Y. (2007) · Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory · doi:10.1561/0100000018 · Cited by 320
A Distributionally Robust Optimization Based Method for Stochastic Model Predictive Control
Li, B., Tan, Y., Wu, A.-G., & Duan, G.-R. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2021.3124750 · Cited by 156
Theory and applications of robust optimization
Bertsimas, D., Brown, D. B., & Caramanis, C. (2011) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/080734510 · Cited by 134
Energy-Efficient Processing and Robust Wireless Cooperative Transmission for Edge Inference
Yang, K., Shi, Y., Yu, W., & Ding, Z. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2979523 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Nemirovski, A., & Shapiro, A.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Optimization
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 969-996
- ISSN
- 1052-6234 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7189
- OpenAlex
- W2099506495
- Cited by
- 1,160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convex Approximations of Chance Constrained Programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/050622328
- The paper
- Nemirovski, A., & Shapiro, A. (2007). Convex Approximations of Chance Constrained Programs. SIAM Journal on Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/050622328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.