CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 570Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTransportation and Mobility InnovationsElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infrastructure planning for electric vehicles with battery swapping

Open access
Mak, Ho-Yin, Rong, Ying, Shen, Zuo-Jun Max·2013·Management Science
DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1672
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) have been proposed as a key technology to help cut down the massive greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. Unfortunately, because of the limited capacity of batteries, typical EVs can only travel for about 100 miles on a single charge and require hours to be recharged. The industry has proposed a novel solution centered around the use of “swapping stations,” at which depleted batteries can be exchanged for recharged ones in the middle of long trips. The possible success of this solution hinges on the ability of the charging service provider to deploy a cost-effective infrastructure network, given only limited information regarding adoption rates. We develop robust optimization models that aid the planning process for deploying battery-swapping infrastructure. Using these models, we study the potential impacts of battery standardization and technology advancements on the optimal infrastructure deployment strategy. This paper was accepted by Dimitris Bertsimas, optimization.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1672

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mak et al. proposed robust optimization models to help battery exchange planning.

    “Mak et al. [62] proposed robust optimization models that help the process of the battery exchange planning.”

    From A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

  • Mak et al. analyzed battery standardization and technological development in the optimal strategy for deploying battery exchange infrastructures.

    “The authors also analyzed the possibility of battery standardization and technological development in the optimal strategy for deploying the infrastructures.”

    From A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bradsher K, 2011, New York Times
  2. Chambers S, 2011, Electric Vehicle Update
  3. Fehrenbacher K, 2010, GigaOM
  4. Jamison B, 1965, Probab. Theory and Related Fields, 4, 40
  5. Kerschbaum M, 2010, Better Place Blog
  6. Reuters, 2012, Reuters
  7. Schwartz A, 2010, Fast Company
  8. Schwartz ND, 2010, New York Times
  9. Vlasic B, 2013, New York Times

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Mak, H.-Y., Rong, Y., & Shen, Z.-J. M.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID
Venue
Management Science
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Published
2013-07
Volume
59
Issue
7
Pages
1557-1575
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
DOI
10.1287/mnsc.1120.1672
OpenAlex
W3125825357
Cited by
570
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Management Science (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
electric vehicles, battery replacement, charging infrastructure planning, robust optimization, battery standardization, cost-effective network design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review