The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: Convergence Rates, Measurement Delays, and Asynchronous Events
Open accessAbstract
This paper uses recently established properties of compositions of directed graphs together with results from the theory of nonhomogeneous Markov chains to derive worst case convergence rates for the headings of a group of mobile autonomous agents which arise in connection with the widely studied Vicsek consensus problem. The paper also uses graph-theoretic constructions to solve modified versions of the Vicsek problem in which there are measurement delays, asynchronous events, or a group leader. In all three cases the conditions under which consensus is achieved prove to be almost the same as the conditions under which consensus is achieved in the synchronous, delay-free, leaderless case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Self-citationDistributed asynchronous deterministic and stochastic gradient optimization algorithms
Tsitsiklis, J., Bertsekas, D., & Athans, M. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1986.1104412 · Cited by 1,967
Cited by
Distributed Control of Robotic Networks: A Mathematical Approach to Motion Coordination Algorithms
Bullo, F., Cortés, J., & Martínez, S. (2009) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831470 · Cited by 1,509
A survey of distributed optimization
Yang, T., Yi, X., Wu, J., Yuan, Y., Wu, D., Meng, Z., Hong, Y., Wang, H., Lin, Z., & Johansson, K. H. (2019) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.05.006 · Cited by 913
Hou, Z.-G., Cheng, L., & Tan, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2007810 · Cited by 668
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 553
Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks With Hostile Camps: Consensus vs. Polarization
Proskurnikov, A. V., Matveev, A. S., & Cao, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2015.2471655 · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, M., Morse, A. S., & Anderson, B. D. O.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 601-623
- ISSN
- 0363-0129 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7138
- OpenAlex
- W2159499856
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: Convergence Rates, Measurement Delays, and Asynchronous Events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/060657029
- The paper
- Cao, M., Morse, A. S., & Anderson, B. D. O. (2008). Reaching a Consensus in a Dynamically Changing Environment: Convergence Rates, Measurement Delays, and Asynchronous Events. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/060657029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.