The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relative-Error $CUR$ Matrix Decompositions
Open accessAbstract
Many data analysis applications deal with large matrices and involve approximating the matrix using a small number of “components.” Typically, these components are linear combinations of the rows and columns of the matrix, and are thus difficult to interpret in terms of the original features of the input data. In this paper, we propose and study matrix approximations that are explicitly expressed in terms of a small number of columns and/or rows of the data matrix, and thereby more amenable to interpretation in terms of the original data. Our main algorithmic results are two randomized algorithms which take as input an $m\times n$ matrix A and a rank parameter k. In our first algorithm, C is chosen, and we let $A'=CC^+A$, where $C^+$ is the Moore–Penrose generalized inverse of C. In our second algorithm C, U, R are chosen, and we let $A'=CUR$. (C and R are matrices that consist of actual columns and rows, respectively, of A, and U is a generalized inverse of their intersection.) For each algorithm, we show that with probability at least $1-\delta$, $\|A-A'\|_F\leq(1+\epsilon)\,\|A-A_k\|_F$, where $A_k$ is the “best” rank-k approximation provided by truncating the SVD of A, and where $\|X\|_F$ is the Frobenius norm of the matrix X. The number of columns of C and rows of R is a low-degree polynomial in k, $1/\epsilon$, and $\log(1/\delta)$. Both the Numerical Linear Algebra community and the Theoretical Computer Science community have studied variants of these matrix decompositions over the last ten years. However, our two algorithms are the first polynomial time algorithms for such low-rank matrix approximations that come with relative-error guarantees; previously, in some cases, it was not even known whether such matrix decompositions exist. Both of our algorithms are simple and they take time of the order needed to approximately compute the top k singular vectors of A. The technical crux of our analysis is a novel, intuitive sampling method we introduce in this paper called “subspace sampling.” In subspace sampling, the sampling probabilities depend on the Euclidean norms of the rows of the top singular vectors. This allows us to obtain provable relative-error guarantees by deconvoluting “subspace” information and “size-of-A” information in the input matrix. This technique is likely to be useful for other matrix approximation and data analysis problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
A haplotype map of the human genome
The International HapMap Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04226 · Cited by 5,858
Generalized Inverses: Theory and Applications
Rohatgi, V. K., Ben-Israel, A., & Greville, T. N. E. (1976) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1403291 · Cited by 4,506
Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning
Blum, A. L., & Langley, P. (1997) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00063-5 · Cited by 3,298
Bhatia, R. (1996) · Cited by 2,847
RCV1: A New Benchmark Collection for Text Categorization Research
Lewis, D., Yang, Y., Rose, T. G., & Li, F. (2004) · Goldsmiths (University of London) · doi:10.5555/1005332.1005345 · Cited by 2,503
(1991) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(91)90038-5 · Cited by 2,437
Eigentaste: A Constant Time Collaborative Filtering Algorithm
Goldberg, K., Roeder, T., Gupta, D., & Perkins, C. (2001) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1023/a:1011419012209 · Cited by 1,438
Spectral grouping using the nystrom method
Fowlkes, C., Belongie, S., Chung, F., & Malik, J. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.1262185 · Cited by 1,328
Cited by
CUR matrix decompositions for improved data analysis
Mahoney, M. W., & Drineas, P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803205106 · Cited by 773
Self-citationA Randomized Algorithm for Principal Component Analysis
Rokhlin, V., Szlam, A., & Tygert, M. (2010) · SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1137/080736417 · Cited by 422
A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems
Tang, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing · doi:10.1145/3313276.3316310 · Cited by 360
Numerical linear algebra in the streaming model
Clarkson, K. L., & Woodruff, D. P. (2009) · Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1536414.1536445 · Cited by 301
Random sketch learning for deep neural networks in edge computing
Li, B., Chen, P., Liu, H., Guo, W., Cao, X., Du, J., Zhao, C., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00039-6 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Drineas, P., Mahoney, M. W., & Muthukrishnan, S.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 844-881
- ISSN
- 0895-4798 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7162
- OpenAlex
- W1998269045
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 22.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative-Error $CUR$ Matrix Decompositions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/07070471x
- The paper
- Drineas, P., Mahoney, M. W., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2008). Relative-Error $CUR$ Matrix Decompositions. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1137/07070471x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.