Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 461

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relative-Error $CUR$ Matrix Decompositions

Open access
Drineas, Petros, Mahoney, Michael W., Muthukrishnan, S.·2008·SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications

Abstract

Many data analysis applications deal with large matrices and involve approximating the matrix using a small number of “components.” Typically, these components are linear combinations of the rows and columns of the matrix, and are thus difficult to interpret in terms of the original features of the input data. In this paper, we propose and study matrix approximations that are explicitly expressed in terms of a small number of columns and/or rows of the data matrix, and thereby more amenable to interpretation in terms of the original data. Our main algorithmic results are two randomized algorithms which take as input an $m\times n$ matrix A and a rank parameter k. In our first algorithm, C is chosen, and we let $A'=CC^+A$, where $C^+$ is the Moore–Penrose generalized inverse of C. In our second algorithm C, U, R are chosen, and we let $A'=CUR$. (C and R are matrices that consist of actual columns and rows, respectively, of A, and U is a generalized inverse of their intersection.) For each algorithm, we show that with probability at least $1-\delta$, $\|A-A'\|_F\leq(1+\epsilon)\,\|A-A_k\|_F$, where $A_k$ is the “best” rank-k approximation provided by truncating the SVD of A, and where $\|X\|_F$ is the Frobenius norm of the matrix X. The number of columns of C and rows of R is a low-degree polynomial in k, $1/\epsilon$, and $\log(1/\delta)$. Both the Numerical Linear Algebra community and the Theoretical Computer Science community have studied variants of these matrix decompositions over the last ten years. However, our two algorithms are the first polynomial time algorithms for such low-rank matrix approximations that come with relative-error guarantees; previously, in some cases, it was not even known whether such matrix decompositions exist. Both of our algorithms are simple and they take time of the order needed to approximately compute the top k singular vectors of A. The technical crux of our analysis is a novel, intuitive sampling method we introduce in this paper called “subspace sampling.” In subspace sampling, the sampling probabilities depend on the Euclidean norms of the rows of the top singular vectors. This allows us to obtain provable relative-error guarantees by deconvoluting “subspace” information and “size-of-A” information in the input matrix. This technique is likely to be useful for other matrix approximation and data analysis problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/07070471x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 461

Metadata

Authors
Drineas, P., Mahoney, M. W., & Muthukrishnan, S.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
Published
2008-01
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
844-881
ISSN
  • 0895-4798 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7162
OpenAlex
W1998269045
Cited by
461
References
35
FWCI
22.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative-Error $CUR$ Matrix Decompositions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/07070471x
The paper
Drineas, P., Mahoney, M. W., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2008). Relative-Error $CUR$ Matrix Decompositions. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1137/07070471x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.