Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 824

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Conjugate Gradient Method and Trust Regions in Large Scale Optimization

Steihaug, Trond·1983·SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis

Abstract

Algorithms based on trust regions have been shown to be robust methods for unconstrained optimization problems. All existing methods, either based on the dogleg strategy or Hebden-More iterations, require solution of system of linear equations. In large scale optimization this may be prohibitively expensive. It is shown in this paper that an approximate solution of the trust region problem may be found by the preconditioned conjugate gradient method. This may be regarded as a generalized dogleg technique where we asymptotically take the inexact quasi-Newton step. We also show that we have the same convergence properties as existing methods based on the dogleg strategy using an approximate Hessian.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/0720042

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 824

Metadata

Authors
Steihaug, T.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis
Published
1983-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
626-637
ISSN
  • 0036-1429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7170
OpenAlex
W2000389939
Cited by
824
References
0
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Conjugate Gradient Method and Trust Regions in Large Scale Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0720042
The paper
Steihaug, T. (1983). The Conjugate Gradient Method and Trust Regions in Large Scale Optimization. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1137/0720042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.