The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions
Abstract
The basis pursuit problem seeks a minimum one-norm solution of an underdetermined least-squares problem. Basis pursuit denoise (BPDN) fits the least-squares problem only approximately, and a single parameter determines a curve that traces the optimal trade-off between the least-squares fit and the one-norm of the solution. We prove that this curve is convex and continuously differentiable over all points of interest, and show that it gives an explicit relationship to two other optimization problems closely related to BPDN. We describe a root-finding algorithm for finding arbitrary points on this curve; the algorithm is suitable for problems that are large scale and for those that are in the complex domain. At each iteration, a spectral gradient-projection method approximately minimizes a least-squares problem with an explicit one-norm constraint. Only matrix-vector operations are required. The primal-dual solution of this problem gives function and derivative information needed for the root-finding method. Numerical experiments on a comprehensive set of test problems demonstrate that the method scales well to large problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Cited by
COMMIT: Convex Optimization Modeling for Microstructure Informed Tractography
Daducci, A., Dal Palu, A., Lemkaddem, A., & Thiran, J.-P. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2014.2352414 · Cited by 255
Dictionary Learning-Based Sparse Channel Representation and Estimation for FDD Massive MIMO Systems
Ding, Y., & Rao, B. D. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2018.2843786 · Cited by 161
Compressed Sensing for Multidimensional Spectroscopy Experiments
Sanders, J. N., Saikin, S. K., Mostame, S., Andrade, X., Widom, J. R., Marcus, A. H., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz300988p · Cited by 83
Representer Theorems for Sparsity-Promoting $\ell _{1}$ Regularization
Unser, M., Fageot, J., & Gupta, H. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2016.2590421 · Cited by 36
Socrates: Data Story Generation via Adaptive Machine-Guided Elicitation of User Feedback
Wu, G., Guo, S., Hoffswell, J., Chan, G. Y.-Y., Rossi, R. A., & Koh, E. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3327363 · Cited by 15
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Berg, E., & Friedlander, M. P.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 890-912
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2083042020
- Cited by
- 1,939
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 85.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.