The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NESTA: A Fast and Accurate First-Order Method for Sparse Recovery
Open accessAbstract
Accurate signal recovery or image reconstruction from indirect and possibly undersampled data is a topic of considerable interest; for example, the literature in the recent field of compressed sensing is already quite immense. This paper applies a smoothing technique and an accelerated first-order algorithm, both from Nesterov [Math. Program. Ser. A, 103 (2005), pp. 127–152], and demonstrates that this approach is ideally suited for solving large-scale compressed sensing reconstruction problems as (1) it is computationally efficient, (2) it is accurate and returns solutions with several correct digits, (3) it is flexible and amenable to many kinds of reconstruction problems, and (4) it is robust in the sense that its excellent performance across a wide range of problems does not depend on the fine tuning of several parameters. Comprehensive numerical experiments on realistic signals exhibiting a large dynamic range show that this algorithm compares favorably with recently proposed state-of-the-art methods. We also apply the algorithm to solve other problems for which there are fewer alternatives, such as total-variation minimization and convex programs seeking to minimize the $\ell_1$ norm of $Wx$ under constraints, in which W is not diagonal. The code is available online as a free package in the MATLAB language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms
Candès, E., Demanet, L., Donoho, D., & Ying, L. (2006) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/05064182x · Cited by 2,573
Self-citationA New TwIST: Two-Step Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithms for Image Restoration
Bioucas-Dias, J. M., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.909319 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
A significance test for the lasso
Lockhart, R., Taylor, J., Tibshirani, R. J., & Tibshirani, R. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1175 · Cited by 541
Computation of Two-Dimensional Spectra Assisted by Compressed Sampling
Almeida, J., Prior, J., & Plenio, M. B. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz3009369 · Cited by 24
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, S., Bobin, J., & Candès, E. J.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-39
- ISSN
- 1936-4954 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023722580
- Cited by
- 848
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 63.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.