The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares: Algorithms, Convergence Analysis, and Numerical Comparisons
Abstract
In solving robust linear regression problems, the parameter vector x, as well as an additional parameter s that scales the residuals, must be estimated simultaneously. A widely used method for doing so consists of first improving the scale parameter s for fixed x, and then improving x for fixed s by using a quadratic approximation to the objective function g. Since improving x is the expensive part of such algorithms, it makes sense to define the new scale s as a minimizes of g for fixed x. A strong global convergence analysis of this conceptual algorithm is given for a class of convex criterion functions and the so-called H- or W-approximations to g. Moreover, some appropriate finite and iterative subalgorithms for minimizing g with respect to s are discussed. Furthermore, the possibility of transforming the robust regression problem into a nonlinear least-squares problem is discussed. All algorithms described here were tested with a set of test problems, and the computational efficiency was compared with that of published algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
Holland, P. W., & Welsch, R. E. (1977) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610927708827533 · Cited by 2,115
Cited by
van Dyk, D. A., & Meng, X.-L. (2001) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/10618600152418584 · Cited by 1,052
Image super-resolution: the techniques, applications, and future
Yue, L., Shen, H., Li, J., Yuan, Q., Zhang, H., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.002 · Cited by 554
Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure
Farquharson, C. G., & Oldenburg, D. W. (1998) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00555.x · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolke, R., & Schwetlick, H.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 907-921
- ISSN
- 0196-5204 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-3417
- OpenAlex
- W2028496557
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares: Algorithms, Convergence Analysis, and Numerical Comparisons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0909062
- The paper
- Wolke, R., & Schwetlick, H. (1988). Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares: Algorithms, Convergence Analysis, and Numerical Comparisons. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0909062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.