The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the use of general, non-l 2 measures of data misfit and model structure in the solution of the non-linear inverse problem. Of particular interest are robust measures of data misfit, and measures of model structure which enable piecewise-constant models to be constructed. General measures can be incorporated into traditional linearized, iterative solutions to the non-linear problem through the use of an iteratively reweighted least-squares (IRLS) algorithm. We show how such an algorithm can be used to solve the linear inverse problem when general measures of misfit and structure are considered. The magnetic stripe example of Parker (1994) is used as an illustration. This example also emphasizes the benefits of using a robust measure of misfit when outliers are present in the data. We then show how the IRLS algorithm can be used within a linearized, iterative solution to the non-linear problem. The relevant procedure contains two iterative loops which can be combined in a number of ways. We present two possibilities. The first involves a line search to determine the most appropriate value of the trade-off parameter and the complete solution, via the IRLS algorithm, of the linearized inverse problem for each value of the trade-off parameter. In the second approach, a schedule of prescribed values for the trade-off parameter is used and the iterations required by the IRLS algorithm are combined with those for the linearized, iterative inversion procedure. These two variations are then applied to the 1-D inversion of both synthetic and field time-domain electromagnetic data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L., & Constable, C. G. (1987) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1442303 · Cited by 2,772
Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
Holland, P. W., & Welsch, R. E. (1977) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610927708827533 · Cited by 2,115
Robust Modeling With Erratic Data
Claerbout, J. F., & Muir, F. (1973) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1440378 · Cited by 833
Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functions
Egbert, G. D., & Booker, J. R. (1986) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1986.tb04552.x · Cited by 682
On the robust estimation of power spectra, coherences, and transfer functions
Chave, A. D., Thomson, D. J., & Ander, M. E. (1987) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb092ib01p00633 · Cited by 349
Levy, S., & Fullagar, P. K. (1981) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/1.1441261 · Cited by 258
Approximation theory and numerical methods
Watson, G. A. (1980) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 212
Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares: Algorithms, Convergence Analysis, and Numerical Comparisons
Wolke, R., & Schwetlick, H. (1988) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0909062 · Cited by 206
Robust Regression Computation Using Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares
O’Leary, D. P. (1990) · SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1137/0611032 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Farquharson, C. G., & Oldenburg, D. W.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 213-227
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2167794065
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 2.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00555.x
- The paper
- Farquharson, C. G., & Oldenburg, D. W. (1998). Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00555.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.